C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER XX—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION › PART 2200—RULES OF PROCEDURE › Subpart B—Parties and Representatives

29 C.F.R. § 2200.20

Party status

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Affected employees. (1) Affected employees and authorized employee representatives may elect party status concerning any matter in which the Act confers a right to participate. The election shall be accomplished by filing a written notice of election at least 14 days before the hearing. A notice of election filed less than 14 days prior to the hearing is ineffective unless good cause is shown for not timely filing the notice.

(2) A notice of election shall be served on all other parties in accordance with § 2200.7.

(b) Employees no longer employed by cited employer. An employee of a cited employer who was exposed to or had access to the hazard arising out of the allegedly violative circumstances, conditions, practices, or operations and who is no longer employed by the cited employer is permitted to participate as a party.

(c) Employee contest. (1) Where a notice of contest is filed by an employee or by an authorized employee representative with respect to the reasonableness of the period for abatement of a violation, the employer charged with the responsibility of abating the violation may elect party status by a notice filed at least 14 days before the hearing.

(2) A notice of election shall be served on all other parties in accordance with § 2200.7.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1977–1985 · leading case: Cuyahoga Valley Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union, 474 U.S. 3 (1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cuyahoga Valley Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union, 474 U.S. 3 (1985). “§ 659 (c); 29 CFR § 2200.20 (a) (1985). If an employer contests the citation, and the Secretary intends to seek its enforcement, the Secretary must file a complaint with the Commission within 20 days, and the employer must file an answer within 15 days.”
Marshall v. Sun Petroleum Prods. Co., 622 F.2d 1176 (3rd Cir. 1980). · cites it 3× “On September 30, 1976, Local Union 8-901 of the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union elected party status in accordance with Commission Rule 20, 29 C.F.R. § 2200.20 . Party status was granted on October 21, 1976.”
Raymond J. Donovan, Sec'y of Labor v. Oil, Chem., & Atomic Workers Int'l Union & Its Local 4-23, 718 F.2d 1341 (5th Cir. 1983). “[Intervention: appearance by non-parties]” 29 C.F.R. § 2200.20 (1981). . Specifically, the Union objected in No.”
Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace, Agric. Implement Workers Of Am. (Uaw) v. United States Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 557 F.2d 607 (7th Cir. 1977). “However, on May 10, 1973, Ford requested the Commission to accord it party status and was thereafter treated as a party as permitted by the Commission's rules (29 C.F.R. 2200.20(b)). On June 18, 1973, 6 Ford filed a response objecting to the June 1, 1974, abatement date, and on…”
Oil, Chem. & Atomic Workers Int'l Union v. Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 671 F.2d 643 (D.C. Cir. 1982). “On November 16, 1979, OCAW elected party status pursuant to *140 Commission Rule 20(a), 29 C.F.R. § 2200.20 , in order to participate in hearings concerning this citation before the OSHRC.”
Donovan v. Daniel Marr & Son Co., 763 F.2d 477 (1st Cir. 1985). “§ 659 (c) and 29 C.F.R. § 2200.20 (a). In respect to the first citation, Marr contended that section 1926.”
Donovan v. Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 713 F.2d 918 (2d Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “He noted that the last sentence of § 10(e) was unqualified by either the Act or the Commission rule permitting employees to elect party status, 29 C.F.R. § 2200.20 (1982), 6 and that the statutory scheme provided for extensive employee involvement in the entire range of…”
Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace, Agric. Implement Workers v. United States Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 557 F.2d 607 (7th Cir. 1977). “However, on May 10, 1978, Ford requested the Commission to accord it party status and was thereafter treated as a party as permitted by the Commission’s rules (29 C.F.R. 2200.20(b)). On June 18, 1973, 6 Ford filed a response objecting to the June 1, 1974, abatement date, and on…”
— 29 C.F.R. § 2200.20(b) — 2 cases
Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace, Agric. Implement Workers Of Am. (Uaw) v. United States Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 557 F.2d 607 (7th Cir. 1977). “However, on May 10, 1973, Ford requested the Commission to accord it party status and was thereafter treated as a party as permitted by the Commission's rules (29 C.F.R. 2200.20(b)). On June 18, 1973, 6 Ford filed a response objecting to the June 1, 1974, abatement date, and on…”
Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace, Agric. Implement Workers v. United States Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 557 F.2d 607 (7th Cir. 1977). “However, on May 10, 1978, Ford requested the Commission to accord it party status and was thereafter treated as a party as permitted by the Commission’s rules (29 C.F.R. 2200.20(b)). On June 18, 1973, 6 Ford filed a response objecting to the June 1, 1974, abatement date, and on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.