29 C.F.R. § 2700.65
Proposed findings, conclusions and orders
The ALJ may require the submission of proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and orders, together with supporting briefs. The proposals shall be served upon all parties, and shall contain adequate references to the record and authorities.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1982–1984 · leading case: Sellersburg Stone Co. v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 736 F.2d 1147 (7th Cir. 1984).
Sellersburg Stone Co. v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 736 F.2d 1147 (7th Cir. 1984). “Under the Commission’s regulations, decisions of AUs must “include findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the reasons or bases for them, on all material issues of fact, law or discretion presented by the record.”
Allied Prods. Co. v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n & Raymond J. Donovan, 666 F.2d 890 (5th Cir. 1982). “Allied claims that the administrative law judge did not make the findings required by 29 C.F.R. § 2700.65 (a) (1980) on employee misconduct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.