(a) Act or FLSA means the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (52 Stat. 1060, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 201-219).
(b) 1985 Amendments means the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1985 (Pub. L. 99-150).
(c) Public agency means a State, a political subdivision of a State or an interstate governmental agency.
(d) State means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or any other Territory or possession of the United States (29 U.S.C. 203(c) and 213(f)).
Notes of Decisions
Rodríguez Cruz v. Padilla Ayala, 125 P.R. Dec. 486 (1990).
· cites it 2× “a los empleados del sector público, 29 C.F.R. 553.1 et seq. (1987).( 30 ) Bajo la Sec.”
Beebe v. United States, 226 Ct. Cl. 308 (Ct. Cl. 1981).
“These regulations are codified in 29 C.F.R. sections 553.1 to 553.21 (1979) and were issued for the purpose of applying the new law specifically to "Employees of Public Agencies Engaged in Fire Protection or Law Enforcement Activities (Including Security Personnel in…”
Conway v. Takoma Park Volunteer Fire Dep't, Inc., 666 F. Supp. 786 (D. Md. 1987).
· cites it 2× “See 29 CFR § 553.1 (c) (“These statutory provisions, as is apparent from their terms, are limited to public agencies and do not apply to any private organization engaged in furnishing fire protection or law enforcement services, and this is so even if the services are provided…”
Dymond v. United States Postal Serv., 515 F. Supp. 396 (E.D. Mo. 1981).
“29 CFR 553.1(e). Non-disclosure of the voluminous Confidential Field Manual does not negate the defendant’s honesty of intention inasmuch as credible testimony established that the defendant regarded it merely as procedure necessary for minimally acceptable Inspector performance.”
29 C.F.R. § 553.1(d): 1 case
29 C.F.R. § 553.1(e): 1 case
Dymond v. United States Postal Serv., 515 F. Supp. 396 (E.D. Mo. 1981).
“29 CFR 553.1(e). Non-disclosure of the voluminous Confidential Field Manual does not negate the defendant’s honesty of intention inasmuch as credible testimony established that the defendant regarded it merely as procedure necessary for minimally acceptable Inspector performance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.