30 C.F.R. § 732.1

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part sets forth criteria and procedures for decisions to approve or disapprove submissions of State programs and program amendments, including requirements for public participation in the process of approval or disapproval.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–2020 · leading case: West Virginia Mining & Reclamation Ass'n v. Babbitt, 970 F. Supp. 506 (S.D.W. Va 1997).
West Virginia Mining & Reclamation Ass'n v. Babbitt, 970 F. Supp. 506 (S.D.W. Va 1997). “See 30 C.F.R. § 732.1 to .17; Arch Mineral Corp.”
Ohio Valley Env't Coalition v. Caperton (S.D.W. Va 2020). “Plaintiffs’ brief in opposition to the Motion characterizes the Complaint as presenting only one claim: “Plaintiffs’ claim in this case [is] that Defendant has failed to provide notification to OSM of a change in program status [as required by 30 C.F.R. § 732.1 ].” Pltfs.’ Resp.…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.