C.F.R. » Title 30 » CHAPTER VII—OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER G—SURFACE COAL MINING AND RECLAMATION OPERATIONS PERMITS AND COAL EXPLORATION SYSTEMS UNDER REGULATORY PROGRAMS › PART 773—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMITS AND PERMIT PROCESSING

30 C.F.R. § 773.23

Suspension or rescission requirements for improvidently issued permits

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, we, the regulatory authority, must suspend or rescind your permit upon expiration of the time specified in § 773.22(b) or (c) of this part unless you submit evidence and we find that—

(1) The violation has been abated or corrected to the satisfaction of the agency with jurisdiction over the violation;

(2) You or your operator no longer own or control the relevant operation;

(3) Our finding for suspension or rescission was in error;

(4) The violation is the subject of a good faith administrative or judicial appeal (unless there is an initial judicial decision affirming the violation, and that decision remains in force);

(5) The violation is the subject of an abatement plan or payment schedule that is being met to the satisfaction of the agency with jurisdiction over the violation; or

(6) You are pursuing a good faith challenge or administrative or judicial appeal of the relevant ownership or control listing or finding (unless there is an initial judicial decision affirming the listing or finding, and that decision remains in force).

(b) If you have requested administrative review of a notice of proposed suspension or rescission under § 773.22(e) of this part, we will not suspend or rescind your permit unless and until the Office of Hearings and Appeals or its State counterpart affirms our finding that your permit was improvidently issued.

(c) When we suspend or rescind your permit under this section, we must—

(1) Issue you a written notice requiring you to cease all surface coal mining operations under the permit; and

(2) Post the notice at our office closest to the permit area.

(d) If we suspend or rescind your permit under this section, you may request administrative review of the notice under the procedures at 43 CFR 4.1370 through 4.1377 (when OSM is the regulatory authority) or under the State regulatory program equivalent (when a State is the regulatory authority). Alternatively, you may seek judicial review of the notice.

[65 FR 79665, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 68029, Dec. 3, 2007]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2001 · leading case: Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 251 F.3d 1007 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 251 F.3d 1007 (D.C. Cir. 2001). · cites it 3× “NMA also contended that state primacy was undercut by 30 C.F.R. § 773.23 (b)(2) (1999), which, it claimed, barred states from issuing permits when the AVS showed links to unabated violations issued by other states or by OSM.”
Natl Mining Assn v. DOI, 251 F.3d 1007 (D.C. Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “at 79,665 (to be codified at 30 C.F.R. 773.23). Since nothing indicates that the new regulations require AVS information to control state decisions, the remainder of NMA's state primacy challenge is moot.”
— 30 C.F.R. § 773.23(b)(2) — 1 case
Natl Mining Assn v. DOI, 251 F.3d 1007 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “at 79,665 (to be codified at 30 C.F.R. 773.23). Since nothing indicates that the new regulations require AVS information to control state decisions, the remainder of NMA's state primacy challenge is moot.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.