30 C.F.R. § 842.14

Review of adequacy and completeness of inspections

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person who is or may be adversely affected by a surface coal mining and reclamation operation or a coal exploration operation may notify the Director or his or her designee in writing of any alleged failure on the part of the Office to make adequate and complete or periodic Federal inspections. The notification shall include sufficient information to create a reasonable belief that the regulations of this part are not being complied with and to demonstrate that the person is or may be adversely affected. The Director or his or her designee shall within 15 days of receipt of the notification determine whether adequate and complete or periodic inspections have been made. The Director or his or her designee shall furnish the complainant with a written statement of the reasons for such determination and the actions, if any, taken to remedy the noncompliance.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1981–1981 · leading case: Webb v. Fury, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20934 (W. Va. 1981).
Webb v. Fury, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20934 (W. Va. 1981). “III 1979); 30 C.F.R. § 842.14 ; and to obtain from OSM a written statement of the reasons for its final disposition of a case investigated because of information supplied by that citizen, 30 U.”
Webb v. Fury, 282 S.E.2d 28 (W. Va. 1981). “III 1979); 30 C.F.R. § 842.14 (1979); and to obtain from OSM a written statement of the reasons for its final disposition of a case investigated because of information supplied by that citizen, 30 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.