31 C.F.R. § 210.9

Parties to the reclamation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Agreement of RDFI. An RDFI's acceptance of a benefit payment pursuant to this part shall constitute its agreement to this subpart. By accepting a benefit payment subject to this part, the RDFI authorizes the debiting of the Federal Reserve Bank account utilized by the RDFI in accordance with the provisions of § 210.10(e).

(b) The Federal Government. In processing reclamations pursuant to this subpart, the Service shall act pursuant to the direction of the agency that certified the benefit payment(s) being reclaimed.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1983–1985 · leading case: First Interstate Bank v. Haynes, 699 P.2d 1168 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
First Interstate Bank v. Haynes, 699 P.2d 1168 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). “Under the provisions of 31 CFR § 210.9 , 3 plaintiff was accountable for the payments and *717 paid the whole amount to the department on December 7, 1982.”
Beauchesne v. Nimmo, 562 F. Supp. 250 (D. Conn. 1983). “” 31 C.F.R. § 210.9 instructs that when credit payments should have been returned to the Government due to the death of a recipient, the financial organization “shall be accountable to the Government for the total amount of any such credit payments”, with certain limitations not…”
Dockstader v. Miller, 719 F.2d 327 (10th Cir. 1983). “31 C.F.R. § 210.9 (a). In 31 C.F.R. § 210.”
Breault v. Heckler, 591 F. Supp. 308 (D. Conn. 1984). “See also 31 C.F.R. § 210.9 (a), providing certain limitations — apparently inapplicable here — on a financial organization’s liability to the government for credit payments received after the death or incapacity of a recipient or beneficiary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.