31 C.F.R. § 211.2
Claims for the release of withheld checks or for the proceeds thereof
Claims for the release of checks or warrants withheld from delivery or for the proceeds thereof, shall be filed with the administrative agency which would have originally authorized such issuance, e.g., claims arising out of checks or warrants representing payments under laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs shall be filed with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC 20420.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1969–1974 · leading case: Gorun v. Fall, 393 U.S. 398 (1969).
Gorun v. Fall, 393 U.S. 398 (1969). “3526 ; 31 CFR § 211.2 . As our opinion in Zschernig makes clear, a state probate judge is not authorized to make or apply a probate rule contrary to that federal policy.”
Bjarsch v. DiFalco, 300 F. Supp. 960 (S.D.N.Y. 1969). “They are, however, residents of the Russian Occupied Zone of Germany (East Germany), to which checks drawn on the United States Treasury may not be transmitted by virtue of 31 C.F.R. § 211.2 (1968). The Challenged Statute Section 2218 of the New York Surrogate’s Court Procedure…”
Desautels, 307 N.E.2d 576 (Mass. App. Ct. 1974). “were deleted from the United States Treasury regulation restricting distribution of funds from United States Government sources ( 31 C.F.R. § 211.2 ) a factor to be considered by the court in passing upon the procedure to be followed in the distribution of private funds to…”
Bjarsch v. DiFalco, 314 F. Supp. 127 (S.D.N.Y. 1970). “They argue that under the language of section 2218(1) (a), once it is established that an alien beneficiary resides in a nation included on the' Treasury List, 31 C.F.R. § 211.2 , the Surrogate must order the deposit of the money or property into court.”
DeSautels, 307 N.E.2d 576 (Mass. App. Ct. 1974). “were deleted from the United States Treasury regulation restricting distribution of funds from United States Government sources ( 31 C.F.R. § 211.2 ) — a factor to be considered by the court in passing upon the procedure to be followed in the distribution of private funds to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.