C.F.R. » Title 31 » CHAPTER II—FISCAL SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › SUBCHAPTER A—BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE › PART 315—REGULATIONS GOVERNING U.S. SAVINGS BONDS, SERIES A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, AND K, AND U.S. SAVINGS NOTES › Subpart K—Minors, Incompetents, Aged Persons, Absentees, et al.

31 C.F.R. § 315.61

Payment after death

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

After the death of the ward, and at any time prior to the representative's discharge, the representative of the estate will be entitled to obtain payment of a bond to which the ward was solely entitled.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1960–2020 · leading case: Free v. Bland, 369 U.S. 663 (1962).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Free v. Bland, 369 U.S. 663 (1962). · cites it 2× “” 31 CFR § 315.61 . After Mrs. Free passed away in 1958, this controversy arose between the husband, who claimed exclusive ownership by operation of the Treasury Regulations, and the son, who, as the principal beneficiary under his mother’s will, claimed an interest in the bonds…”
Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Dep't of the Treasury, 684 F.3d 382 (3rd Cir. 2012). “at 1091 (quoting 31 C.F.R. § 315.61 ). While in the case before us the conflict between state and federal law is less stark, we similarly hold that the relevant federal statutes and regulations preempt the States’ unclaimed property acts.”
Ramsey v. Ramsey, 535 P.2d 53 (Idaho 1975). · cites it 2× “" 82 S.Ct. 1092 -93. The bond in controversy was purchased with community funds and issued to "Mr.”
Horstman Est., 159 A.2d 514 (Pa. 1960). · cites it 2× “[9] 31 C.F.R. § 315.61 . [10] 31 C.F.R. § 315.”
Thaxton v. Thaxton, 405 P.2d 932 (N.M. 1965). · cites it 2× “interest ■ in the bonds by virtue of the community property law of Texas.”
Est. of Layne v. Williams, 727 S.W.2d 157 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987). “Free claimed exclusive ownership pursuant to Treasury regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 315.61 . Section 315.61 provided that for bonds issued in the “or” form, “[i]f either co-owner dies .”
Kentucky Co. v. Hayes, 407 F.2d 1031 (6th Cir. 1969). “another Treasury Regulation, 31 C.F.R. § 315.61 (now § 315.62), the Kentucky Court of Appeals held that the survivor was the sole owner and that lack of possession did not defeat his title.”
the Est. of Leah Rita Tillotson (Tex. App. 2020). “at 664–65 (quoting 31 C.F.R. § 315.61 [recodified at 31 C.F.”
Treasurer State NJ v. US Dept Treas (3rd Cir. 2012). “at 1091 (quoting 31 C.F.R. § 315.61 ). While in the case before us the conflict between state and federal law is less stark, we similarly hold that the relevant federal statutes and regulations preempt the States‟ unclaimed property acts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.