31 C.F.R. § 550.205

Exempt transactions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Personal communications. The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any postal, telegraphic, telephonic, or other personal communication that does not involve the transfer of anything of value.

(b) Official business. The prohibitions contained in § 550.201(a) do not apply to any transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–1990 · leading case: Herman Chang, Patrick Conners, William Guthrie, Warren Parkhurst, John Register & John Woodward v. The United States, 859 F.2d 893 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
Herman Chang, Patrick Conners, William Guthrie, Warren Parkhurst, John Register & John Woodward v. The United States, 859 F.2d 893 (Fed. Cir. 1988). “Most important to the present appeal was the executive order provision codified at 31 C.F.R. § 550.205 , which provided: “Except as authorized, no U.”
Nat'l Oil Corp. v. Libyan Sun Oil Co., 733 F. Supp. 800 (D. Del. 1990). “” 31 C.F.R. § 550.205 . 36 . Sun Oil asserts that Libyan law determines the appropriate rate of prejudgment interest.”
Chang v. United States, 13 Cl. Ct. 555 (Ct. Cl. 1987). “” 31 C.F.R. § 550.205 . The regulations further prohibit the unauthorized export of goods, technology or services to Libya, § 550.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.