31 C.F.R. § 560.501
General and specific licensing procedures
For provisions relating to licensing procedures, see part 501, subpart E of this chapter. Licensing actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. General licenses and statements of licensing policy relating to this part also may be available through the Iran sanctions page on the Office of Foreign Assets Control's Web site (www.treasury.gov/ofac).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2004–2010 · leading case: Kashani v. Tsann Kuen China Enter. Co., 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4052 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004).
Kashani v. Tsann Kuen China Enter. Co., 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4052 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004). “204 ), and to the licensing provisions in subpart E, which provide that “[n]o license or other authorization contained in this part, or otherwise issued by or under the direction of the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, authorizes or validates any transaction…”
United States v. Quinn, 403 F. Supp. 2d 57 (D.D.C. 2005). “” See 31 C.F.R. § 560.501 (c). And, as noted above, the specific regulation that is at the forefront of this prosecution makes no direct mention of a licensing-requirement.”
United States v. Mousavi, 604 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2010). “See 31 C.F.R. § 560.501 . Ill Mousavi makes two arguments as to why the evidence introduced by the government at trial was insufficient to allow any reasonable jury to convict him of a violation of IEEPA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.