31 C.F.R. § 560.504

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1993–2001 · leading case: United States v. Shahrokh Ahangaran, 998 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1993).
United States v. Shahrokh Ahangaran, 998 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1993). · cites it 8× “ISSUE Whether the district court abused its discretion in ruling that 31 C.F.R. § 560.504 was not relevant to this case.”
United States v. Zia Hassanzadeh, 271 F.3d 574 (4th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “” 31 C.F.R. § 560.504 (a) (1987-1995). The importer needed “independent corroborating documentary evidence issued and certified by a disinterested party,” and could not obtain a license simply by providing “affidavits, statements, and other documents prepared by the applicant or…”
United States v. Hassanzadeh (4th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “" 31 C.F.R. § 560.504 (a) (1987-1995). The importer needed "independent corroborating documentary evidence issued and certified by a disinterested party," and could not obtain a license sim- ply by providing "affidavits, statements, and other documents pre- pared by the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.