32 C.F.R. § 153.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part:

(a) Implements policies and procedures, and assigns responsibilities under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000, as amended by section 1088 of the “Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005,” October 28, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for exercising extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction over certain military personnel, former service members of the United States Armed Forces, and over civilians employed by or accompanying the Armed Forces outside the United States (U.S.).

(b) Implements section 3266 of the Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2011–2011 · leading case: United States v. Williams, 825 F. Supp. 2d 117 (D.D.C. 2011).
United States v. Williams, 825 F. Supp. 2d 117 (D.D.C. 2011). “Nor do the regulations promulgated for the purpose of “[i]mplement[ing] policies and procedures, and assigning] responsibilities under [MEJA],” 32 C.F.R. § 153.1 (a), define the term “residing with” or “residence.”
United States v. Williams (D.D.C. 2011). “Nor do the regulations promulgated for the purpose of “[i]mplement[ing] policies and procedures, and assign[ing] responsibilities under [MEJA],” 11 32 C.F.R. § 153.1 (a), define the term “residing with” or “residence.”
United States v. Williams (D.D.C. 2011). “” 32 C.F.R. § 153.1 (a). In addition, the Court also has found that a federal statute conferring extraterritorial jurisdiction for crimes relating to trafficking in persons similarly includes a “residing with” prong.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.