32 C.F.R. § 1624.2
Issuance of induction orders
The Director of Selective Service, upon receipt of a call from the Secretary of Defense for persons to be inducted into the Armed Forces in accord with § 1624.4, shall issue orders to report for induction to registrants whose registration records are in the master computer file at the beginning of any day on which orders are issued. Orders shall be issued in such numbers and at such times as will assure that such call or requisition is filled. The names contained in the Selective Service System data base on a given day will constitute the valid list of registrants from which induction orders can be issued on that day.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38
cases, 1952–1974 · leading case: McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. 185 (1969).
McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. 185 (1969). “32 CFR §§ 1624.2 (c), (d) (1969). Following the local board's decision, the registrant has the right to appeal to the state appeal board.”
Elliott Ashton Welsh, II v. United States, 404 F.2d 1078 (9th Cir. 1969). “2(B), 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2 (b), affords a registrant the opportunity to present “further information.”
United States v. John Douglas Broyles, 423 F.2d 1299 (4th Cir. 1970). “Moreover, while the registrant has a right to a personal appearance before the Board, he must place in writing the information he wants considered, or if orally presented, he must submit a written summary of such information to the Board for inclusion in his file.”
United States v. Derstine, 129 F. Supp. 117 (E.D. Pa. 1954). “32 C.F.R. 1624.2 (b). If the registrant does not appear when he has been given an opportunity to do so this fact must be entered into the minutes of the Local Board.”
James Wesley Bradshaw v. United States, 242 F.2d 180 (10th Cir. 1957). “The local board is justified in setting a timelimit upon the presentation of evidence by registrant, 32 CFR 1624.2(b), and refusing to hear and transmit merely cumulative evidence, Niznik v.”
United States v. Burlich, 257 F. Supp. 906 (S.D.N.Y. 1966). “statistics indicate that, during the latter part of 1965 when defendant’s case was before the local board, approximately $4960 per year was needed, after deductions for payment of income and personal taxes and occupational expenses, to support a family of three at a “ ‘modest…”
Davis v. United States, 199 F.2d 689 (6th Cir. 1952). “” 32 C.F.R., Section 1624.2(b), of the regulations governing appearances of registrants before local draft boards.”
United States v. Corliss, 173 F. Supp. 677 (S.D.N.Y. 1959). “32 CFR 1624.2(c). The board entered upon Form 100 a notation of defendant’s appearance on that date, and recorded a unanimous vote though it does not appear upon what question the vote was taken.”
United States v. Ray Nevin Stetter, Jr., 445 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1971). “Absent a statement of reasons, the assurance in the regulations that at the personal appearance “the registrant may discuss his classification, may point out the class or classes in which he thinks he should have been placed, and may direct attention to any information in his…”
United States v. William Francis Curry, Jr., 410 F.2d 1297 (1st Cir. 1969). “The burden is on the registrant to provide a transcript, 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2 (b). 4 *1300 At least in the absence of a showing of serious prejudice, we deem ourselves confined to a most restricted power of review.”
United States v. Jonathan Lippman Edwards, 450 F.2d 49 (1st Cir. 1971). “Here, however, appellant having established a prima facie claim, it is easy to conceive of supplementary, consistent material that could have been submitted at his personal appearance under 32 CFR § 1624.2 . 4 In addition, he could have submitted a statement on appeal indicating…”
Murray v. Blatchford, 307 F. Supp. 1038 (D.R.I. 1969). “After the processing of his classification request at personal appearance, 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2 , and if he were reclassified I-A, Murray would have had the right to request an appeal within sixty days following reclassification.”
— 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2(a) — 1 case
United States v. Derstine, 129 F. Supp. 117 (E.D. Pa. 1954). “32 C.F.R. 1624.2 (b). If the registrant does not appear when he has been given an opportunity to do so this fact must be entered into the minutes of the Local Board.”
— 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2(b) — 6 cases
United States v. John Douglas Broyles, 423 F.2d 1299 (4th Cir. 1970). “Moreover, while the registrant has a right to a personal appearance before the Board, he must place in writing the information he wants considered, or if orally presented, he must submit a written summary of such information to the Board for inclusion in his file.”
James Wesley Bradshaw v. United States, 242 F.2d 180 (10th Cir. 1957). “The local board is justified in setting a timelimit upon the presentation of evidence by registrant, 32 CFR 1624.2(b), and refusing to hear and transmit merely cumulative evidence, Niznik v.”
Davis v. United States, 199 F.2d 689 (6th Cir. 1952). “” 32 C.F.R., Section 1624.2(b), of the regulations governing appearances of registrants before local draft boards.”
Elliott Ashton Welsh, II v. United States, 404 F.2d 1078 (9th Cir. 1969). “2(B), 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2 (b), affords a registrant the opportunity to present “further information.”
United States v. Patrick James Fisher, 442 F.2d 109 (7th Cir. 1971).
— 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2(c) — 2 cases
Elliott Ashton Welsh, II v. United States, 404 F.2d 1078 (9th Cir. 1969). “2(B), 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2 (b), affords a registrant the opportunity to present “further information.”
United States v. Corliss, 173 F. Supp. 677 (S.D.N.Y. 1959). “32 CFR 1624.2(c). The board entered upon Form 100 a notation of defendant’s appearance on that date, and recorded a unanimous vote though it does not appear upon what question the vote was taken.”
— 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2(d) — 4 cases
Elliott Ashton Welsh, II v. United States, 404 F.2d 1078 (9th Cir. 1969). “2(B), 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2 (b), affords a registrant the opportunity to present “further information.”
United States v. Corliss, 173 F. Supp. 677 (S.D.N.Y. 1959). “32 CFR 1624.2(c). The board entered upon Form 100 a notation of defendant’s appearance on that date, and recorded a unanimous vote though it does not appear upon what question the vote was taken.”
United States v. Derstine, 129 F. Supp. 117 (E.D. Pa. 1954). “32 C.F.R. 1624.2 (b). If the registrant does not appear when he has been given an opportunity to do so this fact must be entered into the minutes of the Local Board.”
United States v. Singleton, 282 F. Supp. 762 (S.D.N.Y. 1968).
— 32 C.F.R. § 1624.2(e) — 4 cases
United States v. Majher, 250 F. Supp. 106 (S.D.W. Va 1966).
United States v. Derstine, 129 F. Supp. 117 (E.D. Pa. 1954). “32 C.F.R. 1624.2 (b). If the registrant does not appear when he has been given an opportunity to do so this fact must be entered into the minutes of the Local Board.”
Lane v. Allen, 307 F. Supp. 881 (N.D. Ohio 1969).
United States v. John Bruce Crull, 469 F.2d 94 (9th Cir. 1972).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.