32 C.F.R. § 1660.1
Purpose
This part establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for the release of official information in litigation and the presentation of witness testimony by Selective Service System (SSS) personnel pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 301 and the Supreme Court's decision in United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1964–1974 · leading case: Johnson v. Robison, 415 U.S. 361 (1974).
Johnson v. Robison, 415 U.S. 361 (1974). “” Further, §456 (j) and 32 CFR §§ 1660.1 — .12 (1972) authorized local Selective Service Boards to order 1-0 conscientious objectors to perform alternative civilian service contributing to the maintenance of the national health, safety, or interest.”
Brian Isaacson v. Penn Cmty. Servs., Inc., Brian Isaacson v. Penn Cmty. Servs., Inc., 450 F.2d 1306 (4th Cir. 1971). “such civilian work contributing to the maintenance of the national health, safety, or interest as the local board pursuant to Presidential regulations may deem appropriate * * Under the Regulations adopted thereunder, 32 C.F.R. § 1660.1 et seq., plaintiff was permitted to…”
United States v. Lloyd Odin Lawson, 337 F.2d 800 (3rd Cir. 1964). “” 32 C.F.R. § 1660.1 (1952). 24 . “Determination of type of civilian work to he performed and order hy local hoard to perform such work.”
United States v. William Crosby Crouch, Jr., 415 F.2d 425 (5th Cir. 1969). “' The definition thereof is contained in 32 C.F.R. 1660.1 (Selective Service Regulation 1660.”
United States v. David Marshall Pence, 410 F.2d 557 (8th Cir. 1969). “See generally 32 C.F.R. § 1660.1 et seq. 5 . Classification by the appeal board is, of course, de novo.”
David Earl Fore v. United States, 395 F.2d 548 (10th Cir. 1968). “Medical Center is a suitable institution for civilian work as required by 32 C.F.R. 1660.1. Appellant asserts that the burden is on the Government to show the validity of the induction order and thus it had a burden to show that all the procedural requirements behind the…”
Richard Walter Burton v. United States, 402 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1969). “32 C.F.R. § 1660.1 . Indeed, the evidence indicates that such employment appears on the State Director’s list of approved employment in several states.”
Michael C. Horey v. Dr. Curtis Tarr, Nat'l Dir. of Selective Serv., 470 F.2d 775 (2d Cir. 1972). “6, as a part of a new set of regulations, 32 C. F.R. § 1660.1 et seq., promulgated December 10, 1971, which placed control over the selection of alternate service assignments in the hands of State Selective Service Directors who are to give due consideration to five enumerated…”
George Winston Hall v. United States, 437 F.2d 1063 (7th Cir. 1971). “1 (32 C.F.R. 1660.1) in pertinent part provides : “(a) The types of employment which may be considered under the provisions of section 6 (j) of title I of the Military Selective Service Act of 1967 [formerly known as the Universal Military Training and Service Act] to be…”
United States v. David Eugene Berrier, 434 F.2d 572 (4th Cir. 1971). “32 C.F.R. § 1660.1 defines appropriate civilian work as follows: “(a) The types of employment which may be considered * * * to be civilian work contributing to the maintenance of the national health, safety, or interest, and appropriate to be performed in lieu of induction into…”
Michael James Walsh v. United States, 436 F.2d 1188 (9th Cir. 1971). “1(a) (1) of the Selective Service System’s Regulations ( 32 C.F.R. § 1660.1 (a) (1)) describes appropriate civilian work to which a registrant can be assigned in lieu of induction.”
Schuster v. Selective Serv. Local Bd. No. 76, 330 F. Supp. 702 (E.D. Wis. 1971). “) The regulations, 32 C.F.R. § 1660.1 , define appropriate civilian work as follows: “(a) The types of employment which may be considered under the provisions of section 6(j) of title I of the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, to be civilian work contributing to the…”
— 32 C.F.R. § 1660.1(a) — 1 case
Richard Walter Burton v. United States, 402 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1969). “32 C.F.R. § 1660.1 . Indeed, the evidence indicates that such employment appears on the State Director’s list of approved employment in several states.”
— 32 C.F.R. § 1660.1(a)(1) — 1 case
Michael James Walsh v. United States, 436 F.2d 1188 (9th Cir. 1971). “1(a) (1) of the Selective Service System’s Regulations ( 32 C.F.R. § 1660.1 (a) (1)) describes appropriate civilian work to which a registrant can be assigned in lieu of induction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.