32 C.F.R. § 1903.7

Trespassing

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Entering, or remaining on any Agency installation without proper authorization is prohibited. Failure to obey an order to leave given under this section by an authorized person, or reentry or attempted reentry onto the Agency installation after being ordered to leave or after being instructed not to reenter by an authorized person under this section is also prohibited.

(b) Any person who violates the provisions of this part may be ordered to leave the Agency installation by an authorized person. A violator's reentry may also be prohibited.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2019 · leading case: United States v. McArthur, 108 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 1997).
United States v. McArthur, 108 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 1997). “10 (possession of firearms prohibited at Pentagon without authorization from Defense Protective Service); 32 C.F.R. § 1903.7 (possession of firearms prohibited on CIA protected property without authorization from Director of Security); 44 C.”
United States v. Lauren Greene (4th Cir. 2019). “PER CURIAM: Lauren Greene appeals her conviction and sentence for misdemeanor trespassing, in violation of 32 C.F.R. § 1903.7 (a) (2012). Greene argues that her conviction before a magistrate judge, which the district court affirmed, violated her due process rights…”
United States v. Joy First, 580 F. App'x 171 (4th Cir. 2014). “PER CURIAM: After a bench trial before a magistrate judge, Joy First, Phillip Runkel, Malachy Kilbride, Janice Sevre’-Duszynska and Max Obuszewski were convicted of trespassing in violation of 32 C.F.R. § 1903.7 (a) (2014). The district court affirmed their convictions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.