32 C.F.R. § 536.5
The Judge Advocate General
TJAG has worldwide Army Staff responsibility for administrative settlement of claims by and against the U.S. government, generated by employees of the U.S. Army and DOD components other than the Departments of the Navy and Air Force. Where the Army has single-service responsibility, TJAG has responsibility for the Army. See DODD 5515.9. Certain claims responsibilities of TJAG are exercised by The Assistant Judge Advocate General (TAJAG) as set forth in this part and directed by TJAG.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1999–2007 · leading case: Struhs v. Prot. Tech., Inc., 992 P.2d 164 (Idaho 1999).
Struhs v. Prot. Tech., Inc., 992 P.2d 164 (Idaho 1999). “5 (b)(3) directs in part, “[C]laims from the workmen’s compensation carrier as subrogee or otherwise will not be considered payable where the United States has paid the premiums, directly or indirectly, for the workmen’s compensation insurance.” As noted above, the appropriate…”
Penn Millers Ins. Ex Rel. S & C Constr. Co. v. United States, 472 F. Supp. 2d 705 (E.D.N.C. 2007). “3 (d); 32 C.F.R. § 536.5 (b)(2). This rule makes sense because an insured and an insurance company may have different losses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.