C.F.R. » Title 32 » CHAPTER VII—DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE › SUBCHAPTER D—CLAIMS AND LITIGATION › PART 842—ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS › Subpart E—Foreign Claims (10 U.S.C. 2734)

32 C.F.R. § 842.52

Who are proper claimants

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Claimants include inhabitants of a foreign country who are:

(a) Foreign nationals. In a wrongful death case, if the decedent is an inhabitant of a foreign country, even though his or her survivors are U.S. inhabitants, the FCA will apply.

(b) U.S. nationals residing abroad, unless the claim arises from a benefit, privilege or service provided to them by the U.S. Government, or they reside in the foreign country primarily because they are employed directly by the United States, or sponsored by or accompanying such a person, or employed by a U.S. civilian contractor in furtherance of a contract with the U.S. Government, or sponsored by or accompanying such a person.

(c) U.S. corporations with a place of business in the country in which the claim arose.

(d) Foreign governments and their political subdivisions, including a municipal and prefectural government.

(e) Foreign companies and business entities.

[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83692, 83693, Nov. 22, 2016]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2004–2004 · leading case: Murphy ex rel. Est. of Payne v. United States, 340 F. Supp. 2d 160 (D. Conn. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Murphy ex rel. Est. of Payne v. United States, 340 F. Supp. 2d 160 (D. Conn. 2004). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs exhausted administrative remedies by filing an unsuccessful appeal with the administrative appellate authority pursuant to Air Force Instruction 51-501 and 32 C.F.R. § 842.52 (a). Compl. [doc. # 1], ¶ 13.”
Murghy Ex Rel. Est. of Oayne v. United States, 340 F. Supp. 2d 160 (D. Conn. 2004). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs exhausted administrative remedies by filing an unsuccessful appeal with the administrative appellate authority pursuant to Air Force Instruction 51-501 and 32 C.F.R. § 842.52 (a). Compl. [doc. # 1], ¶ 13.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.