C.F.R. » Title 33 » CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER J—BRIDGES › PART 115—BRIDGE LOCATIONS AND CLEARANCES; ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

33 C.F.R. § 115.10

Sufficiency of State authority for bridges

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

An opinion of the attorney general of the State as to the sufficiency of State authority for the construction of a bridge is acceptable to the Coast Guard in doubtful cases.

[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17771, Dec. 12, 1967. Redesignated by USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35081, July 28, 2017]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1986–1986 · leading case: Port of Jacksonville Mar. Ad Hoc Comm., Inc. v. United States Coast Guard, 788 F.2d 705 (11th Cir. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Port of Jacksonville Mar. Ad Hoc Comm., Inc. v. United States Coast Guard, 788 F.2d 705 (11th Cir. 1986). · cites it 2× “In 33 C.F.R. 115.10(a) the Coast Guard has mandated that “[s]pecific time limitations are [to be] inserted in all [bridge-building] permits for the commencement of construction and completion thereof.”
Port Of Jacksonville Mar. Ad Hoc Comm., Inc. v. United States Coast Guard, 788 F.2d 705 (11th Cir. 1986). · cites it 2× “In 33 C.F.R. 115.10(a) the Coast Guard has mandated that "[s]pecific time limitations are [to be] inserted in all [bridge-building] permits for the commencement of construction and completion thereof.”
— 33 C.F.R. § 115.10(a) — 2 cases
Port of Jacksonville Mar. Ad Hoc Comm., Inc. v. United States Coast Guard, 788 F.2d 705 (11th Cir. 1986). “In 33 C.F.R. 115.10(a) the Coast Guard has mandated that “[s]pecific time limitations are [to be] inserted in all [bridge-building] permits for the commencement of construction and completion thereof.”
Port Of Jacksonville Mar. Ad Hoc Comm., Inc. v. United States Coast Guard, 788 F.2d 705 (11th Cir. 1986). “In 33 C.F.R. 115.10(a) the Coast Guard has mandated that "[s]pecific time limitations are [to be] inserted in all [bridge-building] permits for the commencement of construction and completion thereof.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.