C.F.R. » Title 33 » CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER P—PORTS AND WATERWAYS SAFETY › PART 160—PORTS AND WATERWAYS SAFETY—GENERAL › Subpart C—Notification of Arrival, Hazardous Conditions, and Certain Dangerous Cargoes

33 C.F.R. § 160.216

Notice of hazardous conditions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Whenever there is a hazardous condition either on board a vessel or caused by a vessel or its operation, the owner, agent, master, operator, or person in charge must immediately notify the nearest Coast Guard Sector Office or Group Office, and in addition submit any report required by 46 CFR 4.05-10.

(b) When the hazardous condition involves cargo loss or jettisoning as described in 33 CFR 97.115, the notification required by paragraph (a) of this section must include—

(1) What was lost, including a description of cargo, substances involved, and types of packages;

(2) How many were lost, including the number of packages and quantity of substances they represent;

(3) When the incident occurred, including the time of the incident or period of time over which the incident occurred;

(4) Where the incident occurred, including the exact or estimated location of the incident, the route the ship was taking, and the weather (wind and sea) conditions at the time or approximate time of the incident; and

(5) How the incident occurred, including the circumstances of the incident, the type of securing equipment that was used, and any other material failures that may have contributed to the incident.

[USCG-2000-7080, 81 FR 28017, May 9, 2016. Redesignated by USCG-2000-7080, 81 FR 59136, Aug. 29, 2016]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: United States v. Patriot Marine LLC (D. Mass. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Patriot Marine LLC (D. Mass. 2023). · cites it 7× “The Coast Guard Hearing Officer sent Patriot Marine a Final Determination letter on March 13, 2019, stating that it violated both counts, and specifically that Patriot Marine was required to report “bump and go” groundings regardless of whether there was obvious damage to the…”
— 33 C.F.R. § 160.216(a) — 1 case
United States v. Patriot Marine LLC (D. Mass. 2023). “The Coast Guard Hearing Officer sent Patriot Marine a Final Determination letter on March 13, 2019, stating that it violated both counts, and specifically that Patriot Marine was required to report “bump and go” groundings regardless of whether there was obvious damage to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.