33 C.F.R. § 173.1
Purpose; preemptive effect
This part prescribes requirements for numbering vessels and for reporting casualties and accidents to implement sections 6101, 6102, 12301, and 12302 of Title 46, United States Code. The regulations in subparts A, B, and D of this part have preemptive effect over conflicting State or local regulation. The regulations in subpart C of this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulation within the same field, except to the extent that Congress requires the Coast Guard to allow State casualty reporting systems pursuant to 46 U.S.C. chapter 131.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1974–1997 · leading case: State v. Sterkel, 933 P.2d 409 (Utah Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Sterkel, 933 P.2d 409 (Utah Ct. App. 1997). “” See also 33 C.F.R. §§ 173.1 -.85 and 174.1-.125 (1995) (regulating state numbering, casualty, and accident reporting systems).”
Press v. Lyford, 36 Cal. App. 3d 986 (Cal. Ct. App. 1974). “; 33 C.F.R. § 173.1 et seq.) Thus, our assessment of the conduct of the parties must necessarily be based on such standards as may be reasonably inferred from those nautical and waterskiing rules and regulations that do exist, and, to some extent, on common sense.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.