(a) With respect to the United States, including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, and any other territory or possession over which the United States exercises sovereignty, exclusive economic zone means the zone seaward of and adjacent to the territorial sea, as defined in § 2.22(a), including the contiguous zone, and extending 200 nautical miles from the territorial sea baseline (except where otherwise limited by treaty or other agreement recognized by the United States) in which the United States has the sovereign rights and jurisdiction and all nations have the high seas freedoms mentioned in Presidential Proclamation 5030 of March 10, 1983.
(b) Under customary international law as reflected in Article 55 of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and with respect to other nations, exclusive economic zone means the waters seaward of and adjacent to the territorial sea, not extending beyond 200 nautical miles from the territorial sea baseline, as recognized by the United States.
[USCG-2001-9044, 68 FR 42598, July 18, 2003, as amended by USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37309, June 21, 2012]
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Jhonathan Alfonso, 104 F.4th 815 (11th Cir. 2024).
· cites it 3× “1, 1280 (defining the EEZ as “an area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea” that “shall not extend beyond 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured,” “under which the rights and jurisdiction of the coastal State and the…”
United States v. Jose Miguel Rosario-Rojas (11th Cir. 2024).
· cites it 3× “1, 1280 (defining the EEZ as “an area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea” that “shall not extend beyond 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured,” “under which the rights and jurisdiction of the coastal State and the…”
United States v. Ricardo Antonio Rodriguez-Diaz (11th Cir. 2024).
“” 33 C.F.R. § 2.30 (b). USCA11 Case: 22-12360 Document: 30-1 Date Filed: 07/09/2024 Page: 3 of 9 22-12360 Opinion of the Court 3 nationality for the vessel—so it was treated as a vessel without nationality (and therefore) subject to the jurisdiction of the United States under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.