33 C.F.R. § 323.5

Program transfer to States

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 404(h) of the CWA allows the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to transfer administration of the section 404 permit program for discharges into certain waters of the United States to qualified States. (The program cannot be transferred for those waters which are presently used, or are susceptible to use in their natural condition or by reasonable improvement as a means to transport interstate or foreign commerce shoreward to their ordinary high water mark, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide shoreward to the high tide line, including wetlands adjacent thereto). See 40 CFR parts 233 and 124 for procedural regulations for transferring section 404 programs to States. Once a State's 404 program is approved and in effect, the Corps of Engineers will suspend processing of section 404 applications in the applicable waters and will transfer pending applications to the State agency responsible for administering the program. District engineers will assist EPA and the States in any way practicable to effect transfer and will develop appropriate procedures to ensure orderly and expeditious transfer.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1981–1990 · leading case: Deltona Corp. v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 476 (Ct. Cl. 1981).
Deltona Corp. v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 476 (Ct. Cl. 1981). “Notably, the Corps — which has also been delegated the task of administering this program, see 33 C.F.R. § 323.5 (1980) — defines "waters of the United States” to include "adjacent wetlands,” 33 C.”
City of Alma v. United States, 744 F. Supp. 1546 (S.D. Ga. 1990). “(a) If the Regional Administrator has reason to believe after evaluating the information available to him, including any record developed under the section 404 referral process specified in 33 CFR 323.5(b), that an “unacceptable adverse effect” could result from the…”
Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 701 F.2d 1011 (2d Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “4 (c) (1981), 8 and to coordinate with EPA, see 33 C.F.R. § 323.5 (1981). 9 Within the Corps, the initial decision would be made by the district engineer; objections by other federal agencies could lead to successive reviews by the division engineer, the chief of engineers, and…”
— 33 C.F.R. § 323.5(b) — 1 case
City of Alma v. United States, 744 F. Supp. 1546 (S.D. Ga. 1990). “(a) If the Regional Administrator has reason to believe after evaluating the information available to him, including any record developed under the section 404 referral process specified in 33 CFR 323.5(b), that an “unacceptable adverse effect” could result from the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.