33 C.F.R. § 334.2
Definitions
(a) Danger zone. A defined water area (or areas) used for target practice, bombing, rocket firing or other especially hazardous operations, normally for the armed forces. The danger zones may be closed to the public on a full-time or intermittent basis, as stated in the regulations.
(b) Restricted area. A defined water area for the purpose of prohibiting or limiting public access to the area. Restricted areas generally provide security for Government property and/or protection to the public from the risks of damage or injury arising from the Government's use of that area.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 2000–2012 · leading case: United States v. Ayala Ayala, 289 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2002).
United States v. Ayala Ayala, 289 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2002). “at 17 (citing 33 C.F.R. §§ 334.2 , 334.1480). We explained that “Puerto Rico’s jurisdiction over the shoreline was established subject to the control of the United States.”
Friends of Back Bay v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 681 F.3d 581 (4th Cir. 2012). “” 33 C.F.R. § 334.2 (b). A "no-wake zone” is not specifi *585 cally defined, but within the context of the permanent Restricted Area designation, detailed infra, the NWZ in this case means that, save for certain carefully delineated exceptions, "[n]o vessel of any type shall…”
United States v. Mar a Del Carmen Ventura-Melendez, 275 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. 2001). “See 33 C.F.R. §§ 334.2 , 334.1480. These regulations allow the Navy to “occupy and control” these areas, and there was adequate testimony at trial demonstrating that the Navy has in fact exercised this power.”
United States v. Zenón-Rodríguez, 289 F.3d 28 (1st Cir. 2002). “” The Zenóns attempt to rely on the separate definitions given to a “danger zone” and to a “restricted area” in 33 C.F.R. § 334.2 , 4 but their argument is to no avail.”
United States v. Zenon, 285 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D.P.R. 2003). “They also showed that this was done in accordance with regulations regarding “danger zones” as defined in 33 C.F.R. § 334.2 and § 334.1470. The notice named the date and locations of the exercise and was posted in nine separate locations in both Spanish and English.”
United States v. De Jesus, 108 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.P.R. 2000). “33 C.F.R. § 334.2 provides as follows: "(a) Danger zone.”
United States v. Zenon, 182 F. Supp. 2d 211 (D.P.R. 2002). “” 33 C.F.R. § 334.2 (2001). 4 . Defendant(s) may very well have records of other previous convictions for the same offense.”
United States v. Zenón-Encarnación, 217 F. Supp. 2d 187 (D.P.R. 2002). “The information filed by the government states that on or about April 9, 2002, defendants trespassed onto waters surrounding Camp Garcia Naval Installation in Vieques, Puerto Rico, a danger zone as described by 33 C.F.R. §§ 334.2 and 334.1470. Defendants Cacimar and Pedro…”
United States v. Ventura-Melendez (1st Cir. 2001). “See 33 C.F.R. §§ 334.2 , 334.1480. These regulations allow the Navy to "occupy and control" these areas, and there was adequate testimony at trial demonstrating that the Navy has in fact exercised this power.”
United States v. Zenon-Encarnacion, 217 F. Supp. 2d 187 (D.P.R. 2002). “The information filed by the government states that on or about April 9, 2002, defendants trespassed onto waters surrounding Camp García Naval Installation in Vieques, Puerto Rico, a danger zone as described by 33 C.F.R. §§ 334.2 and 334.1470. Defendants Cacimar and Pedro…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.