C.F.R. » Title 33 » CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL › PART 6—PROTECTION AND SECURITY OF VESSELS, HARBORS, AND WATERFRONT FACILITIES › Subpart 6.10—Identification and Exclusion of Persons From Vessels and Waterfront Facilities

33 C.F.R. § 6.10-9

Appeals

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Persons who are refused employment or who are refused the issuance of documents or who are required to surrender such documents, under this subpart, shall have the right of appeal, and the Commandant shall appoint Boards for acting on such appeals. Each such Board shall, so far as practicable, be composed of one Coast Guard officer, one member drawn from management, and one member drawn from labor. The members drawn from management and labor shall, upon suitable security clearance, be nominated by the Secretary of Labor. Such members shall be deemed to be employees of the United States and shall be entitled to compensation under the provisions of section 15 of the act of August 2, 1946 (5 U.S.C. 55a) while performing duties incident to such employment. The Board shall consider each appeal brought before it and, in recommending final action to the Commandant, shall insure the appellant all fairness consistent with the safeguarding of the national security.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1953–1953 · leading case: Parker v. Lester, 112 F. Supp. 433 (N.D. Cal. 1953).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Parker v. Lester, 112 F. Supp. 433 (N.D. Cal. 1953). “33 C.F.R. 6.10-9. While such tripartite boards have by now been established, interim boards composed of one Coast Guard official locally and five Coast Guard officials at the National Capitol sat until June, 1951.”
United States v. Gray. United States v. Rogers. United States v. Wickliffe, 207 F.2d 237 (9th Cir. 1953). “” 33 CFR 6.10-9. On such an appeal the seaman is *240 given the first opportunity for a hearing which the regulations afford' him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.