34 C.F.R. § 104.1
Purpose
The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which is designed to eliminate discrimination on the basis of handicap in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: A.G. Ex Rel. Grundemann v. Paradise Valley Unified Sch. Dist. No. 69, 815 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 2016).
A.G. Ex Rel. Grundemann v. Paradise Valley Unified Sch. Dist. No. 69, 815 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 2016). “See 34 C.F.R. § 104.1 . 5 . For instance, section 504 imposes a stricter causal standard ("solely by reason of disability”) than Title II's "motivating factor” standard.”
S.B. v. Cal. Dep't of Educ., 327 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (E.D. Cal. 2018). “34 C.F.R. §§ 104.1 - 104.61. Section 104.”
M.H. Ex Rel. M.H. v. Montana High Sch. Ass'n, 929 P.2d 239 (Mont. 1996). “34 C.F.R. § 104.1 provides that: The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which is designed to eliminate discrimination on the basis of handicap in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
Mccann On Behalf Of J.M. v. York Sch. Dept., 365 F. Supp. 3d 132 (D. Me. 2019). “See 34 C.F.R. §§ 104.1 -104.2 (West 2019). As relevant here, those regulations define a "handicapped person" as a person who "has a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities.”
Smith v. Henderson, 944 F. Supp. 2d 89 (D.D.C. 2013). “33 (a); see also 34 C.F.R. § 104.1 (regulations in Part 104 effectuate section 504).”
Ruth Anne M v. Alvin Indep. Sch. Dist., 532 F. Supp. 460 (S.D. Tex. 1982). “An additional consideration exists in this case. Federal regulations promulgated under section 504 mandate the provision of a free appropriate public education coextensive with the requirements of the EHCA.”
Davis v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Educ., 530 F. Supp. 1209 (D.D.C. 1982). “III 1979), its regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 104.1 et seq. (1980), and the decree in Mills v.”
H. Ex Rel. T.H. v. Montgomery Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 784 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (M.D. Ala. 2011). “”) (emphasis added); see also 34 C.F.R. §§ 104.1 -.54 (establishing separate regulations for § 504 in the following contexts: (1) employment; (2) aecessability; (3) preschool, elementary, and secondary education; (4) postsecondary education; and (5) health, welfare, and social…”
Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Coventry Bd. of Educ., 630 F. Supp. 2d 226 (D. Conn. 2009). “…on the basis of disability in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. 29 U.S.C. § 794 ; 34 C.F.R. § 104.1 .”
Lower Merion Sch. Dist. v. Doe, 878 A.2d 925 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005). “To that end, Section 504 is "designed to eliminate discrimination on the basis of handicap in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance," 34 C.F.R. § 104.1 , by providing in relevant part: No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United…”
Sellers v. Univ. of Rio Grande, 838 F. Supp. 2d 677 (S.D. Ohio 2012). “§ 3413 ; 34 C.F.R. § 104.1 . OCR enforces Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act through regulations found in 34 C.”
Foster v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Educ., 523 F. Supp. 1142 (D.D.C. 1981). “Ill 1979), with its regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 104.1 et seq. (1980). The procedural framework is provided primarily by the former, and incorporated by the latter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.