(a) Purpose. This subpart provides for a system of National Forest System roads, National Forest System trails, and areas on National Forest System lands that are designated for motor vehicle use. After these roads, trails, and areas are designated, motor vehicle use, including the class of vehicle and time of year, not in accordance with these designations is prohibited by 36 CFR 261.13. Motor vehicle use off designated roads and trails and outside designated areas is prohibited by 36 CFR 261.13.
(b) Scope. The responsible official may incorporate previous administrative decisions regarding travel management made under other authorities, including designations and prohibitions of motor vehicle use, in designating National Forest System roads, National Forest System trails, and areas on National Forest System lands for motor vehicle use under this subpart.
(c) For definitions of terms used in this subpart, refer to § 212.1 in subpart A of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Idaho Conservation League v. Guzman, 766 F. Supp. 2d 1056 (D. Idaho 2011).
“36 C.F.R. §§ 212.50 (a), 212.51(a). Any motor vehicle use not in accordance with these designations is prohibited.”
WildEarth Guardians v. Jeffries, 370 F. Supp. 3d 1208 (D. Or. 2019).
“36 C.F.R. §§ 212.50 (a), 212.51(a). It prohibits motor vehicle use off designated roads and trails and outside designated areas.”
Granat v. United States Dep't of Agric., 238 F. Supp. 3d 1242 (E.D. Cal. 2017).
“36 C.F.R. § 212.50 (a). “After these roads, trails, and areas are designated, motor vehicle use, including the class of vehicle and time of year, not in accordance with these designations is prohibited.”
Wilderness Soc'y v. United States Forest Serv., 850 F. Supp. 2d 1144 (D. Idaho 2012).
“See 36 C.F.R. §§ 212.50 (b), 212.55. The designated routes are then displayed on a Motor Vehicle Use Map (“MVUM”) which is annually updated and provided to the public.”
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Ctr. v. Graham, 899 F. Supp. 2d 948 (E.D. Cal. 2012).
“7 See 36 C.F.R. § 212.50 (b). *965 Therefore, the Forest Service did not violate NEPA by failing to assess and disclose environmental impacts of the NFTS or by failing to disclose the NEPA documentation to support the existing NFTS.”
Wild Wilderness v. Allen, 12 F. Supp. 3d 1309 (D. Or. 2014).
“See 36 C.F.R. § 212.50 (a) (stating the purpose of the travel management regulations).”
Wildearth Guardians v. Heather Provencio, 918 F.3d 620 (9th Cir. 2019).
“Department of Agriculture promulgated a Travel Management Rule to “provide[] for a system of National Forest System roads, National Forest System trails, and areas on National Forest System lands that are designated for motor vehicle use.”
Friends of the Clearwater v. Probert (D. Idaho 2022).
· cites it 3× “36 C.F.R. § 212.50 . 1 Additional background information can be found in the Court’s Memorandum Decision and Order entered March 12, 2022.”
Friends of the Clearwater v. Probert (D. Idaho 2022).
“36 C.F.R. § 212.50 . In designating roads, trails, and other areas open to motor vehicle use in national forests, the Forest Service is to consider, among other things, the effects on “National Forest System natural and cultural resources, public safety, provision of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.