36 C.F.R. § 219.4

Requirements for public participation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Providing opportunities for participation. The responsible official shall provide opportunities to the public for participating in the assessment process; developing a plan proposal, including the monitoring program; commenting on the proposal and the disclosure of its environmental impacts in accompanying National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents; and reviewing the results of monitoring information. When developing opportunities for public participation, the responsible official shall take into account the discrete and diverse roles, jurisdictions, responsibilities, and skills of interested and affected parties; the accessibility of the process, opportunities, and information; and the cost, time, and available staffing. The responsible official should be proactive and use contemporary tools, such as the Internet, to engage the public, and should share information in an open way with interested parties. Subject to the notification requirements in § 219.16, the responsible official has the discretion to determine the scope, methods, forum, and timing of those opportunities. The Forest Service retains decisionmaking authority and responsibility for all decisions throughout the process.

(1) Outreach. The responsible official shall engage the public—including Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations, other Federal agencies, State and local governments, individuals, and public and private organizations or entities—early and throughout the planning process as required by this part, using collaborative processes where feasible and appropriate. In providing opportunities for engagement, the responsible official shall encourage participation by:

(i) Interested individuals and entities, including those interested at the local, regional, and national levels.

(ii) Youth, low-income populations, and minority populations.

(iii) Private landowners whose lands are in, adjacent to, or otherwise affected by, or whose actions may impact, future management actions in the plan area.

(iv) Federal agencies, States, counties, and local governments, including State fish and wildlife agencies, State foresters and other relevant State agencies. Where appropriate, the responsible official shall encourage States, counties, and other local governments to seek cooperating agency status in the NEPA process for development, amendment, or revision of a plan. The responsible official may participate in planning efforts of States, counties, local governments, and other Federal agencies, where practicable and appropriate.

(v) Interested or affected federally recognized Indian Tribes or Alaska Native Corporations. Where appropriate, the responsible official shall encourage federally recognized Tribes to seek cooperating agency status in the NEPA process for development, amendment, or revision of a plan. The responsible official may participate in planning efforts of federally recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations, where practicable and appropriate.

(2) Consultation with federally recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. The Department recognizes the Federal Government has certain trust responsibilities and a unique legal relationship with federally recognized Indian Tribes. The responsible official shall honor the government-to-government relationship between federally recognized Indian Tribes and the Federal Government. The responsible official shall provide to federally recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations the opportunity to undertake consultation consistent with Executive Order 13175 of November 6, 2000, and 25 U.S.C. 450 note.

(3) Indigenous knowledge and land ethics. As part of tribal participation and consultation as set forth in paragraphs (a)(1)(v) and (a)(2) of this section, the responsible official shall request information about Indigenous Knowledge, land ethics, cultural issues, and sacred and culturally significant sites.

(b) Coordination with other public planning efforts. (1) The responsible official shall coordinate land management planning with the equivalent and related planning efforts of federally recognized Indian Tribes, Alaska Native Corporations, other Federal agencies, and State and local governments.

(2) For plan development or revision, the responsible official shall review the planning and land use policies of federally recognized Indian Tribes (43 U.S.C. 1712(b)), Alaska Native Corporations, other Federal agencies, and State and local governments, where relevant to the plan area. The results of this review shall be displayed in the environmental impact statement (EIS) for the plan (40 CFR 1502.16(c), 1506.2). The review shall include consideration of:

(i) The objectives of federally recognized Indian Tribes, Alaska Native Corporations, other Federal agencies, and State and local governments, as expressed in their plans and policies;

(ii) The compatibility and interrelated impacts of these plans and policies;

(iii) Opportunities for the plan to address the impacts identified or to contribute to joint objectives; and

(iv) Opportunities to resolve or reduce conflicts, within the context of developing the plan's desired conditions or objectives.

(3) Nothing in this section should be read to indicate that the responsible official will seek to direct or control management of lands outside of the plan area, nor will the responsible official conform management to meet non-Forest Service objectives or policies.

[77 FR 21260, Apr. 9, 2012, as amended at 77 FR 44144, July 27, 2012; 89 FR 37137, May 6, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1991–2010 · leading case: Hammond v. Norton, 370 F. Supp. 2d 226 (D.D.C. 2005).
Hammond v. Norton, 370 F. Supp. 2d 226 (D.D.C. 2005). “See 36 C.F.R. § 219.4 (b)(3); 36 C.F.R. § 219.”
Kurt Meister v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., 623 F.3d 363 (6th Cir. 2010). “See 36 C.F.R. § 219.4 (a), (b); 16 U.S.C. § 1604 (e)(1).”
Lands Council v. Vaught, 198 F. Supp. 2d 1211 (E.D. Wash. 2002). “§ 1604 (a); 36 C.F.R. 219.4(b)(3) (1999). Site-specific decisions, such as ones to sell timber, “must be consistent with the LRMP for the larger area.”
Wind River Multiple-Use Advocates v. Espy, 835 F. Supp. 1362 (D. Wyo. 1993). · cites it 3× “36 C.F.R. § 219.4 (b)(2) (1991). The Regional Guides must “display tentative resource objectives for each Forest from the RPA program.”
Mahler v. United States Forest Serv., 927 F. Supp. 1559 (S.D. Ind. 1996). “See 36 C.F.R. § 219.4 (planning levels for Forest Service planning process); see generally Sierra Club v.”
Sharps v. United States Forest Serv., 823 F. Supp. 668 (D.S.D. 1993). “36 C.F.R. § 219.4 (a). The Nebraska National Forest, which is at the “forest level,” is within the larger Rocky Mountain Region—the “regional level.”
Friends of the Wild Swan, Inc. v. United States Forest Serv., 966 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Or. 1997). “36 C.F.R. § 219.4 (a). Regional and forest planning make use of an interdisciplinary team, which “shall integrate knowledge of the physical, biological, economic and social sciences, and the environmental design arts in the planning process.”
S. Timber Purchasers Council v. Alcock, 779 F. Supp. 1353 (N.D. Ga. 1991). “” 36 C.F.R. § 219.4 (b)(2). The Forest Supervisor then prepares a plan for each forest, or for all forests for which he has responsibility, which is known as a Land Resource Management Plan (“LRMP”).”
Kurt Meister v. U.S. Dep't of Agric. (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “1995) (citing 36 C.F.R. §§ 219.4 - 219.7). The Service’s own regulations prescribe in great detail the procedures the Service must follow in developing a forest plan.”
— 36 C.F.R. § 219.4(b)(3) — 1 case
Lands Council v. Vaught, 198 F. Supp. 2d 1211 (E.D. Wash. 2002). “§ 1604 (a); 36 C.F.R. 219.4(b)(3) (1999). Site-specific decisions, such as ones to sell timber, “must be consistent with the LRMP for the larger area.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.