36 C.F.R. § 223.10
Free use to Alaskan settlers, miners, residents, and prospectors
Bona fide settlers, miners, residents, and prospectors for minerals in Alaska may take free of charge green or dried timber from the National Forests in Alaska for personal use but not for sale. Permits will be required for green saw timber. Other material may be taken without permit. The amount of material granted to any one person in 1 year shall not exceed 10,000 board feet of saw timber and 25 cords of wood, or an equivalent volume in other forms. Persons obtaining materials shall, on demand, forward to the supervisor a statement of the quantity taken and the location from which it was removed.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1981–1999 · leading case: South-Cent. Timber Dev., Inc. v. Wunnicke, 467 U.S. 82 (1984).
South-Cent. Timber Dev., Inc. v. Wunnicke, 467 U.S. 82 (1984). “" 36 CFR § 223.10 (c) (1983). From 1969 to 1973, Congress imposed a maximum export limitation of 350 million board-feet of unprocessed timber from federal lands lying west of the 100th meridian (a line running from central North Dakota through central Texas).”
Willamette Indus., Inc. v. Comm'r, 54 T.C.M. 616 (Tax Ct. 1987). “sec. 221.25 (e) (1974) . For the year 1977, this definition is located at 36 C.”
Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 502 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “It provides in part: “[UJnprocessed included timber shall not be exported from the United States nor used for substitution (as defined in 36 C.F.R. § 223.10 ) for timber from private lands exported by purchaser or an affiliate, directly or indirectly.”
Willamette Indus. v. Comm'r, 64 T.C.M. 202 (Tax Ct. 1992). “The underlying rationale of the regulations, 36 C.F.R. sec 221.”
South-Cent. Timber Dev., Inc. v. LeResche, 693 F.2d 890 (9th Cir. 1982). “The Forest Service regulations are found at 36 C.F.R. § 223.10 (b) (1981). The Bureau of Land Management provisions are set forth at 43 C.”
South-Cent. Timber Dev., Inc. v. LeResche, 511 F. Supp. 139 (D. Alaska 1981). “36 C.F.R. § 223.10 (i). 3 An examination of the relevant statutory provisions shows that Congress has not consented to any primary manufacture requirements imposed by the states.”
Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 215 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “642 provides: “[Ujnprocessed included timber shall not be exported from the United States nor used for substitution (as defined in 36 C.F.R. § 223.10 ) for timber from private, lands exported by purchaser or an affiliate, directly or indirectly.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.