36 C.F.R. § 228.102

Issuance of notices to lessees and operators

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The authorized Forest Service officer may issue Notices to Lessees and Operators necessary to implement the regulations of this subpart either independently with notification to the Bureau of Land Management or jointly with the Bureau of Land Management. Notices to Lessees and Operators apply to all operations conducted by Federal lessees on National Forest System lands supervised by the authorized Forest Service officer who issued such notice.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1997–2018 · leading case: Wyoming Outdoor Council v. United States Forest Serv., 165 F.3d 43 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
Wyoming Outdoor Council v. United States Forest Serv., 165 F.3d 43 (D.C. Cir. 1999). · cites it 15× “WOC contends that the Forest Service violated both (1) its own regulations governing the leasing of land, 36 C.F.R. § 228.102 (e), and (2) the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.”
Wyoming Outdoor Council v. Bosworth, 284 F. Supp. 2d 81 (D.D.C. 2003). · cites it 5× “36 C.F.R. § 228.102 (a)-(d); id. at 8-9 ; Pis.”
Wyoming Outdoor Council v. Dombeck, 148 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2001). · cites it 3× “See 36 C.F.R. § 228.102 (c-d). The second step is “lease authorization,” in which the Forest Service identifies a specific parcel for leasing, performs specific environmental review on that parcel, and determines whether to authorize the BLM to actually lease that parcel.”
San Juan Citizens All. v. U.S. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 326 F. Supp. 3d 1227 (D.N.M. 2018). · cites it 2× “36 C.F.R. § 228.102 (e). [Doc. 26 p. 9; BLM 11815] Then BLM provides a "reasonably foreseeable development scenario" for oil and gas leasing on forest lands.”
Wyoming Outdoor Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 981 F. Supp. 17 (D.D.C. 1997). · cites it 4× “The regulation at issue, 36 C.F.R. § 228.102 , was promulgated by USFS in 1990 to clarify the roles of the several federal agencies involved in the oil and gas leasing process.”
Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. United States Forest Serv., 12 F. App'x 498 (9th Cir. 2001). “IPAA lacks Article III standing for its NEPA, NFMA and MUSYA claims because the Forest Service has discretion whether to authorize the leasing of any particular Forest Service lands for mineral exploration.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.