The following are prohibited:
(a) Depositing in any toilet, toilet vault, or plumbing fixture any substance which could damage or interfere with the operation or maintenance of the fixture.
(b) Possessing or leaving refuse, debris, or litter in an exposed or unsanitary condition.
(c) Placing in or near a stream, lake, or other water any substance which does or may pollute a stream, lake, or other water.
(d) Failing to dispose of all garbage, including any paper, can, bottle, sewage, waste water or material, or rubbish either by removal from the site or area, or by depositing it into receptacles or at places provided for such purposes.
(e) Dumping of any refuse, debris, trash or litter brought as such from private property or from land occupied under permit, except, where a container, dump or similar facility has been provided and is identified as such, to receive trash generated from private lands or lands occupied under permit.
[42 FR 2957, Jan. 14, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 33520, June 30, 1981]
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Godfrey, 112 F. Supp. 3d 1097 (E.D. Cal. 2015).
· cites it 9× “Finally, in Count Five, Defendant was charged with placing in or near a creek any substance which may pollute, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.11 (c). Id. On September 9-10, 2014, a two-day bench trial was held before Magistrate Judge Newman.”
United States v. John Wasson, 627 F. App'x 604 (9th Cir. 2015).
· cites it 8× “10 (b) (unauthorized residency on Forest System lands) and 36 C.F.R. § 261.11 (d) (improper removal or disposal of sewage).”
United States v. Rainbow Fam., 695 F. Supp. 294 (E.D. Tex. 1988).
“9 (prohibiting damage to government property or endangered flora); 36 C.F.R. §§ 261.11 and 261.14(q) (regulating the disposal of refuse and sewage); 36 C.”
United States v. Kent, 679 F. Supp. 985 (E.D. Cal. 1987).
· cites it 2× “§ 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.11 (c)) and failure to remove garbage and rubbish (a violation of 16 U.”
Heath v. Aspen Skiing Corp., 325 F. Supp. 223 (D. Colo. 1971).
“] Nor, for some unclear reason, does plaintiff think that 36 C.F.R. § 261.11 , Occupancy Trespasses, is applicable to him.”
United States v. Pepper, 697 F. Supp. 2d 1171 (E.D. Cal. 2009).
· cites it 3× “6] wherein the court made various findings of fact and concluded that the defendant was guilty of violating 36 C.F.R. § 261.11 (d). 1 Pursuant to the terms of said proposed judgment, the court indicated that it intended to impose a fine in the sum of $175.”
United States v. Dean Mostad (9th Cir. 2019).
“§ 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.11 (c). 2. Mostad argues that his conviction should be vacated because the government failed to issue a notice of noncompliance as required by 36 C.”
— 36 C.F.R. § 261.11(d) — 1 case
United States v. Pepper, 697 F. Supp. 2d 1171 (E.D. Cal. 2009).
“6] wherein the court made various findings of fact and concluded that the defendant was guilty of violating 36 C.F.R. § 261.11 (d). 1 Pursuant to the terms of said proposed judgment, the court indicated that it intended to impose a fine in the sum of $175.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.