36 C.F.R. § 4.1
Applicability and scope
The applicability of the regulations in this part is described in § 1.2 of this chapter. The regulations in this part also apply, regardless of land ownership, on all roadways and parking areas within a park area that are open to public traffic and that are under the legislative jurisdiction of the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1986–2007 · leading case: United States v. Phillip Berry, 866 F.2d 887 (6th Cir. 1989).
United States v. Phillip Berry, 866 F.2d 887 (6th Cir. 1989). “” Prior to the trial, Berry moved to suppress the results of the blood test claiming that it should be excluded by virtue of Tennessee law under 36 C.F.R. § 4.1 3 or, in the alternative, that it was taken in violation of his fourth amendment rights.”
United States v. Caine, 517 F. Supp. 2d 586 (D. Mass. 2007). “” 36 C.F.R. § 4.1 . The National Park Services regulation does provide deference to state procedures, stating: “[u]nless specifically addressed by regulations in this chapter, traffic and the use of vehicles within a park area are governed by State Law.”
United States v. Forrest Michael Sanders, 799 F.2d 557 (9th Cir. 1986). “The first is whether or not the location of the incident is within the reservation, for it is clear that state traffic laws apply to violations that occur off the reservation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.