36 C.F.R. § 4.21

Speed limits

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Park area speed limits are as follows:

(1) 15 miles per hour: within all school zones, campgrounds, picnic areas, parking areas, utility areas, business or residential areas, other places of public assemblage and at emergency scenes.

(2) 25 miles per hour: upon sections of park road under repair or construction.

(3) 45 miles per hour: upon all other park roads.

(b) The superintendent may designate a different speed limit upon any park road when a speed limit set forth in paragraph (a) of this section is determined to be unreasonable, unsafe or inconsistent with the purposes for which the park area was established. Speed limits shall be posted by using standard traffic control devices.

(c) Operating a vehicle at a speed in excess of the speed limit is prohibited.

(d) An authorized person may utilize radiomicrowaves or other electrical devices to determine the speed of a vehicle on a park road. Signs indicating that vehicle speed is determined by the use of radiomicrowaves or other electrical devices are not required.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1990–2007 · leading case: United States v. Barry L. Brown, 364 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Barry L. Brown, 364 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “23(c) (“Count II”); and (3) speeding, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 2 (“Count III”). At a bench trial before the magistrate judge, the government presented evidence that after Brown was stopped by a park ranger for driving 52 miles per hour in a 35-mile-per-hour zone within…”
United States v. Jones, 403 F. Supp. 2d 518 (W.D. Va. 2005). · cites it 5× “23 (a), and speeding 60 miles per hour in a 45-mile-per-hour zone, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 , all within the confines of the Cumberland Gap National Historic Park, (“the Park”), 1 on April 29, 2005.”
United States v. Stanton, 501 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2007). “23 (a)(2), and Count Three charged him with speeding, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 (c). Stanton consented to trial by a magistrate, and proceeded to a two-day bench trial.”
United States v. Wornom, 754 F. Supp. 517 (W.D. Va. 1991). · cites it 3× “The government charged the defendant with violating 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 . The magistrate held that, in accordance with 36 C.”
United States v. Brian Alan Sweeney, United States of Am. v. Christopher Knight, 914 F.2d 1260 (9th Cir. 1990). “23 (a)(1), (2), and for speeding, 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 (b). On September 13, 1988, a ranger issued Sweeney citations in Yosemite for operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level of over .”
United States v. Jones, 428 F. Supp. 2d 497 (W.D. Va. 2006). “23 (a) (2005), and speeding 60 miles per hour in a 45-mil e-an-hour zone, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 (2005), all within the confines of the Cumberland Gap National Historical Park (the “Park”).”
United States v. Davis, 261 F. Supp. 2d 343 (D. Maryland 2003). “] § 16 — 303(i); and Speeding, traveling 80 miles per hour in a 55 mile per hour area, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 (c). 2 . The Government relies on Fed.”
United States v. Means, 252 F. App'x 830 (9th Cir. 2007). “23 (a)(2); and (3) speeding in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.”
United States v. Juv. Male, United States of Am. v. Juv. Male, 388 F.3d 122 (4th Cir. 2004). “1(a); speeding, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 (c); fleeing to elude, in violation of Maryland Code, Transportation Article § 21-904; receiving stolen property, in violation of 36 C.”
United States v. Graham, 234 F. App'x 136 (4th Cir. 2007). “” Graham was also issued violation notices for speeding under 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 (c) and for failing to obtain a Virginia driver’s license after moving to the state under 36 C.”
United States v. Juv. Male (4th Cir. 2004). “1(a); speeding, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 (c); fleeing to elude, in violation of Maryland Code, Transportation Article § 21-904; receiving stolen property, in viola- tion of 36 C.”
United States v. Stanton (9th Cir. 2007). “23 (a)(2), and Count Three charged him with speeding, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.21 (c). Stanton consented to trial by a magistrate, and proceeded to a two-day bench trial.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.