C.F.R. » Title 36 » CHAPTER I—NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › PART 4—VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC SAFETY

36 C.F.R. § 4.3

Authorized emergency vehicles

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The operator of an authorized emergency vehicle, when responding to an emergency or when pursuing or apprehending an actual or suspected violator of the law, may:

(1) Disregard traffic control devices;

(2) Exceed the speed limit; and

(3) Obstruct traffic.

(b) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this section do not relieve the operator from the duty to operate with due regard for the safety of persons and property.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–1996 · leading case: 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3162, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6933 Bicycle Trails Council of Marin, a California Nonprofit Corp. Bicycle Trails Council of the East Bay, a California Nonprofit Corp. Int'l Mountain Bicycling Ass'n, a California Nonprofit Corp. League of Am. Wheelmen, a Maryland Nonprofit Corp. v. Bruce Babbitt, Sec'y of the Interior James M. Ridenour, Dir. of the Nat'l Park Serv. Brian O'neill, Gen. Superintendent of the Golden Gate Nat'l Rec. Area, Bay Area Trails Pres. Council Marin Horse Council Tamalpais Conservation Club Sierra Club & Nat'l Parks & Conservation Ass'n, All Nonprofit Corporations, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees, 82 F.3d 1445 (9th Cir. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3162, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6933 Bicycle Trails Council of Marin, a California Nonprofit Corp. Bicycle Trails Council of the East Bay, a California Nonprofit Corp. Int'l Mountain Bicycling Ass'n, a California Nonprofit Corp. League of Am. Wheelmen, a Maryland Nonprofit Corp. v. Bruce Babbitt, Sec'y of the Interior James M. Ridenour, Dir. of the Nat'l Park Serv. Brian O'neill, Gen. Superintendent of the Golden Gate Nat'l Rec. Area, Bay Area Trails Pres. Council Marin Horse Council Tamalpais Conservation Club Sierra Club & Nat'l Parks & Conservation Ass'n, All Nonprofit Corporations, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees, 82 F.3d 1445 (9th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “30 is entitled to less deference because NPS earlier interpreted the Organic Act to reach an opposite conclusion regarding mountain bicycling in recreation areas under its old 36 C.F.R. section 4.3. See, e.g., Immigration and Naturalization Service v.”
Bicycle Trails Council v. Babbitt, 82 F.3d 1445 (9th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “”), plaintiffs argue that NPS’s latest interpretation of the Organic Act as expressed in 36 C.F.R. section 4.30 is entitled to less deference because NPS earlier interpreted the Organic Act to reach an opposite conclusion regarding mountain bicycling in recreation areas under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.