36 C.F.R. § 51.18
When must the Director reject a proposal?
The Director must reject any proposal received, regardless of the franchise fee offered, if the Director makes any of the following determinations: the offeror is not a qualified person as defined in this part; The offeror is not likely to provide satisfactory service; the proposal is not a responsive proposal as defined in this part; or, the proposal is not responsive to the objectives of protecting and preserving the resources of the park area and of providing necessary and appropriate services to the public at reasonable rates.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: Nat'l Mall Tours of Washington, Inc. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 862 F.3d 35 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
Nat'l Mall Tours of Washington, Inc. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 862 F.3d 35 (D.C. Cir. 2017). “” 36 C.F.R. § 51.18 . A “responsive proposal” is one that the Park Service has “determined” “provide[s] the information required by the prospectus,” among other things.”
Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. Jewell, 249 F. Supp. 3d 360 (D.D.C. 2017). “§ 5952 (4)(B); 36 C.F.R. § 51.18 . Furthermore, NPS regulations prohibited the incumbent concessioners from amending their proposals after expiration of the proposal period, see 36 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.