36 C.F.R. § 59.1

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

These post-completion responsibilities apply to each area or facility for which Land and Water Conservation Fund (L&WCF) assistance is obtained, regardless of the extent of participation of the program in the assisted area or facility and consistent with the contractural agreement between NPS and the State. Responsibility for compliance and enforcement of these provisions rests with the State for both State and locally sponsored projects. The responsibilities cited herein are applicable to the area depicted or otherwise described on the 6(f)(3) boundary map and/or as described in other project documentation approved by the Department of the Interior. In many instances, this mutually agreed to area exceeds that actually receiving L&WCF assistance so as to assure the protection of a viable recreation entity. For leased sites assisted under L&WCF, compliance with post-completion requirements of the grant ceases following lease expiration unless the grant agreement calls for some other arrangement.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1999–2011 · leading case: Brooklyn Heights Ass'n Inc. v. Nat'l Park Serv., 777 F. Supp. 2d 424 (E.D.N.Y 2011).
Brooklyn Heights Ass'n Inc. v. Nat'l Park Serv., 777 F. Supp. 2d 424 (E.D.N.Y 2011). · cites it 4× “36 C.F.R. § 59.1 . Once infused with a LWCF grant, the benefited property is then governed by section 59.”
Friends of Ironbridg v. Babbitt, Sec (4th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 460l-8(f)(3); 36 C.F.R. § 59.1 (1998). The applicable regulations also require that advance notice be given to the NPS for all proposed facility changes; changes "that significantly contravene the original plans for the area must" receive NPS approval.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.