38 C.F.R. § 19.102

Notice of appeal to other contesting parties in simultaneously contested claims

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

When a Substantive Appeal is filed in a simultaneously contested claim, the content of the Substantive Appeal will be furnished to the other contesting parties to the extent that it contains information which could directly affect the payment or potential payment of the benefit which is the subject of the contested claim.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105A(b) (2016)) [57 FR 4104, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 84 FR 179, Jan. 18, 2019]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2014–2019 · leading case: Debra B. Sapp v. Robert L. Wilkie (Vet. App. 2019).
Debra B. Sapp v. Robert L. Wilkie (Vet. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “§ 7105A(b); 38 C.F.R. § 19.102 (2018). Then, VA must allow an interested party 30 days from the date the content of the Substantive Appeal was furnished to submit a response.”
14-01 858 (Board of Vet. App. 2016). “38 C.F.R. § 19.102 (2015). Here, although the Veteran was notified of the RO's initial denial of the appellant's claim, he was not notified of the filing of the NOD, was not provided a copy of the SOC, and was not provided the content of the substantive appeal.”
17-64 419 (Board of Vet. App. 2017). “38 C.F.R. § 19.102 . Review of the record reflects that the contested claims procedures have not been met.”
11-02 249 (Board of Vet. App. 2014). “§ 7105A, 38 C.F.R. § 19.102 . In this case, the Veteran filed a NOD in April 2008.”
10-38 197 (Board of Vet. App. 2015). “See 38 C.F.R. § 19.102 . The evidence shows that the AOJ has since notified the Veteran of the facts that the appellant filed a substantive appeal, and that she did not request a hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.