38 C.F.R. § 3.816

Awards under the Nehmer Court Orders for disability or death caused by a condition presumptively associated with herbicide exposure

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Purpose. This section states effective-date rules required by orders of a United States district court in the class-action case of Nehmer v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, No. CV-86-6160 TEH (N.D. Cal.).

(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section—

(1) Nehmer class member means:

(i) A Vietnam veteran who has a covered herbicide disease; or

(ii) A surviving spouse, child, or parent of a deceased Vietnam veteran who died from a covered herbicide disease.

(2) Covered herbicide disease means a disease for which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs has established a presumption of service connection pursuant to the Agent Orange Act of 1991, Public Law 102-4, other than chloracne, as provided in § 3.309(e).

(c) Effective date of disability compensation. If a Nehmer class member is entitled to disability compensation for a covered herbicide disease, the effective date of the award will be as follows:

(1) If VA denied compensation for the same covered herbicide disease in a decision issued between September 25, 1985 and May 3, 1989, the effective date of the award will be the later of the date VA received the claim on which the prior denial was based or the date the disability arose, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this section. A prior decision will be construed as having denied compensation for the same disease if the prior decision denied compensation for a disease that reasonably may be construed as the same covered herbicide disease for which compensation has been awarded. Minor differences in the terminology used in the prior decision will not preclude a finding, based on the record at the time of the prior decision, that the prior decision denied compensation for the same covered herbicide disease.

(2) If the class member's claim for disability compensation for the covered herbicide disease was either pending before VA on May 3, 1989, or was received by VA between that date and the effective date of the statute or regulation establishing a presumption of service connection for the covered disease, the effective date of the award will be the later of the date such claim was received by VA or the date the disability arose, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this section. A claim will be considered a claim for compensation for a particular covered herbicide disease if:

(i) The claimant's application and other supporting statements and submissions may reasonably be viewed, under the standards ordinarily governing compensation claims, as indicating an intent to apply for compensation for the covered herbicide disability; or

(ii) VA issued a decision on the claim, between May 3, 1989 and the effective date of the statute or regulation establishing a presumption of service connection for the covered disease, in which VA denied compensation for a disease that reasonably may be construed as the same covered herbicide disease for which compensation has been awarded.

(3) If the class member's claim referred to in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section was received within one year from the date of the class member's separation from service, the effective date of the award shall be the day following the date of the class member's separation from active service.

(4) If the requirements of paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section are not met, the effective date of the award shall be determined in accordance with §§ 3.114 and 3.400.

(d) Effective date of dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC). If a Nehmer class member is entitled to DIC for a death due to a covered herbicide disease, the effective date of the award will be as follows:

(1) If VA denied DIC for the death in a decision issued between September 25, 1985 and May 3, 1989, the effective date of the award will be the later of the date VA received the claim on which such prior denial was based or the date the death occurred, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (d)(3) of this section.

(2) If the class member's claim for DIC for the death was either pending before VA on May 3, 1989, or was received by VA between that date and the effective date of the statute or regulation establishing a presumption of service connection for the covered herbicide disease that caused the death, the effective date of the award will be the later of the date such claim was received by VA or the date the death occurred, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (d)(3) of this section. In accordance with § 3.152(b)(1), a claim by a surviving spouse or child for death pension will be considered a claim for DIC. In all other cases, a claim will be considered a claim for DIC if the claimant's application and other supporting statements and submissions may reasonably be viewed, under the standards ordinarily governing DIC claims, as indicating an intent to apply for DIC.

(3) If the class member's claim referred to in paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section was received within one year from the date of the veteran's death, the effective date of the award shall be the first day of the month in which the death occurred.

(4) If the requirements of paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section are not met, the effective date of the award shall be determined in accordance with §§ 3.114 and 3.400.

(e) Effect of other provisions affecting retroactive entitlement—(1) General. If the requirements specified in paragraphs (c)(1) or (c)(2) or (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section are satisfied, the effective date shall be assigned as specified in those paragraphs, without regard to the provisions in 38 U.S.C. 5110(g) or § 3.114 prohibiting payment for periods prior to the effective date of the statute or regulation establishing a presumption of service connection for a covered herbicide disease. However, the provisions of this section will not apply if payment to a Nehmer class member based on a claim described in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section is otherwise prohibited by statute or regulation, as, for example, where a class member did not qualify as a surviving spouse at the time of the prior claim or denial.

(2) Claims Based on Service in the Republic of Vietnam Prior to August 5, 1964. If a claim referred to in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section was denied by VA prior to January 1, 1997, and the veteran's service in the Republic of Vietnam ended before August 5, 1964, the effective-date rules of this regulation do not apply. The effective date of benefits in such cases shall be determined in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 5110. If a claim referred to in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section was pending before VA on January 1, 1997, or was received by VA after that date, and the veteran's service in the Republic of Vietnam ended before August 5, 1964, the effective date shall be the later of the date provided by paragraph (c) or (d) of this section or January 1, 1997.

(Authority: Public Law 104-275, sec. 505)

(f) Payment of Benefits to Survivors or Estates of Deceased Beneficiaries—(1) General. If a Nehmer class member entitled to retroactive benefits pursuant to paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) or (d)(1) through (d)(3) of this section dies prior to receiving payment of any such benefits, VA shall pay such unpaid retroactive benefits to the first individual or entity listed below that is in existence at the time of payment:

(i) The class member's spouse, regardless of current marital status.

Note to paragraph (f)(1)(i):

For purposes of this paragraph, a spouse is the person who was legally married to the class member at the time of the class member's death.

(ii) The class member's child(ren), regardless of age or marital status (if more than one child exists, payment will be made in equal shares, accompanied by an explanation of the division).

Note to paragraph (f)(1)(ii):

For purposes of this paragraph, the term “child” includes natural and adopted children, and also includes any stepchildren who were members of the class member's household at the time of the class member's death.

(iii) The class member's parent(s), regardless of dependency (if both parents are alive, payment will be made in equal shares, accompanied by an explanation of the division).

Note to paragraph (f)(1)(iii):

For purposes of this paragraph, the term “parent” includes natural and adoptive parents, but in the event of successive parents, the persons who last stood as parents in relation to the class member will be considered the parents.

(iv) The class member's estate.

(2) Inapplicability of certain accrued benefit requirements. The provisions of 38 U.S.C. 5121(c) and § 3.1000(c) requiring survivors to file claims for accrued benefits do not apply to payments under this section. When a Nehmer class member dies prior to receiving retroactive payments under this section, VA will pay the amount to an identified payee in accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this section without requiring an application from the payee. Prior to releasing such payment, however, VA may ask the payee to provide further information as specified in paragraph (f)(3) of this section.

(3) Identifying payees. VA shall make reasonable efforts to identify the appropriate payee(s) under paragraph (f)(1) of this section based on information in the veteran's claims file. If further information is needed to determine whether any appropriate payee exists or whether there are any persons having equal or higher precedence than a known prospective payee, VA will request such information from a survivor or authorized representative if the claims file provides sufficient contact information. Before releasing payment to an identified payee, VA will ask the payee to state whether there are any other survivors of the class member who may have equal or greater entitlement to payment under this section, unless the circumstances clearly indicate that such a request is unnecessary.

(4) Bar to accrued benefit claims. Payment of benefits pursuant to paragraph (f)(1) of this section shall bar a later claim by any individual for payment of all or any part of such benefits as accrued benefits under 38 U.S.C. 5121 and § 3.1000.

(g) Awards covered by this section. This section applies only to awards of disability compensation or DIC for disability or death caused by a disease listed in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501) [68 FR 50970, Aug. 25, 2003, as amended at 73 FR 61736, Oct. 17, 2008; 78 FR 54766, Sept. 6, 2013; 86 FR 68410, Dec. 2, 2021]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 2005–2025 · leading case: Lawrence Delisio v. Eric K. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 45 (Vet. App. 2011).
Lawrence Delisio v. Eric K. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 45 (Vet. App. 2011). · cites it 10× “See 38 C.F.R. § 3.816 (c)(2) (2011) ("If the class member's claim for disability compensation for the covered herbicide disease was either pending before VA on May 3, 1989, or was received by VA between that date and the effective date of the statute or regulation establishing a…”
Robinson v. Wilkie, 905 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2018). · cites it 24× “WILKIE The VA assigned an initial disability rating of 10 percent from January 18, 2005 and a 60 percent disability rating from April 2, 2007—the date Mr. Robinson’s diagnostic testing showed that he had coronary artery disease.”
Nehmer v. United States Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 494 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 5× “25, 2003) (to be codified at 38 C.F.R. § 3.816 ) (stating that the “VA’s authority to issue regulatory presumptions of service connection expired on September 30, 2002,” and specifically that the Consent Decree entered by Judge Henderson did not intend to incorporate subsequent…”
In Re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig., 373 F. Supp. 2d 7 (E.D.N.Y 2005). “309 (e) (2004) (listing diseases associated with exposure to certain herbicides that are deemed to be service-related); 38 C.F.R. § 3.816 (2004) (listing diseases for which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs has established a presumption of connection with Agent Orange exposure…”
Johnson v. Shinseki, 340 F. App'x 649 (Fed. Cir. 2009). · cites it 4× “Under a new regulation implementing the Nehmer decision, 38 C.F.R. § 3.816 , diabetes mellitus was added as a disease presumptively caused by in-service exposure to Agent Orange with an effective date of May 8, 2001.”
Ruel v. Wilkie, 918 F.3d 939 (Fed. Cir. 2019). · cites it 2× “38 C.F.R. § 3.816 (d). 2 The RO issued a Statement of the Case, and Mrs.”
Taylor v. McDonough, 3 F.4th 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2021). “38 C.F.R. § 3.816 (creating an exception to 38 U.”
Rosanna Pruent-stevens Vs. Toms River Twp. (tax Court of New Jersey), 206 A.3d 417 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2019). “2002), which led to the adoption of 38 C.F.R. § 3.816 (2013) (titled "Awards under the Nehmer Court Orders for disability or death caused by a condition presumptively associated with herbicide exposure").”
Garza v. Dept. Of Vets. Affairs, 480 F. App'x 984 (Fed. Cir. 2012). · cites it 4× “2002), a disease that is presumptively service-connected based on herbicide exposure in Vietnam receives an effective date for service connection retroactive to the date the Agency received the veteran’s claim, see 38 C.F.R. § 3.816 (c) (regulation implementing Neh-mer ),…”
180727-287 (Board of Vet. App. 2018). · cites it 11× “§ 5110 (2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.816 , 3.400 (2017). 2. The criteria for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss have not been met.”
200512-87606 (Board of Vet. App. 2021). · cites it 10× “In cases where a Nehmer class member who is entitled to retroactive benefits pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 3.816 (c)(1) through (c)(3) dies prior to receiving payment of such benefits, retroactive benefits may be paid to specified individuals, including the class member's spouse,…”
11-34 086 (Board of Vet. App. 2016). · cites it 9× “38 C.F.R. § 3.816 (c)(1)-(2). Specifically, a Nehmer "class member" is defined as a Vietnam Veteran who has a "covered herbicide disease.”
— 38 C.F.R. § 3.816(c)(4) — 1 case
Johnson v. Shinseki, 340 F. App'x 649 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “Under a new regulation implementing the Nehmer decision, 38 C.F.R. § 3.816 , diabetes mellitus was added as a disease presumptively caused by in-service exposure to Agent Orange with an effective date of May 8, 2001.”
— 38 C.F.R. § 3.816(f)(3) — 1 case
Nehmer v. US Vets. Administ (N.D. Cal. 2021).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.