38 C.F.R. § 4.29

Ratings for service-connected disabilities requiring hospital treatment or observation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A total disability rating (100 percent) will be assigned without regard to other provisions of the rating schedule when it is established that a service-connected disability has required hospital treatment in a Department of Veterans Affairs or an approved hospital for a period in excess of 21 days or hospital observation at Department of Veterans Affairs expense for a service-connected disability for a period in excess of 21 days.

(a) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section this increased rating will be effective the first day of continuous hospitalization and will be terminated effective the last day of the month of hospital discharge (regular discharge or release to non-bed care) or effective the last day of the month of termination of treatment or observation for the service-connected disability. A temporary release which is approved by an attending Department of Veterans Affairs physician as part of the treatment plan will not be considered an absence.

(1) An authorized absence in excess of 4 days which begins during the first 21 days of hospitalization will be regarded as the equivalent of hospital discharge effective the first day of such authorized absence. An authorized absence of 4 days or less which results in a total of more than 8 days of authorized absence during the first 21 days of hospitalization will be regarded as the equivalent of hospital discharge effective the ninth day of authorized absence.

(2) Following a period of hospitalization in excess of 21 days, an authorized absence in excess of 14 days or a third consecutive authorized absence of 14 days will be regarded as the equivalent of hospital discharge and will interrupt hospitalization effective on the last day of the month in which either the authorized absence in excess of 14 days or the third 14 day period begins, except where there is a finding that convalescence is required as provided by paragraph (e) or (f) of this section. The termination of these total ratings will not be subject to § 3.105(e) of this chapter.

(b) Notwithstanding that hospital admission was for disability not connected with service, if during such hospitalization, hospital treatment for a service-connected disability is instituted and continued for a period in excess of 21 days, the increase to a total rating will be granted from the first day of such treatment. If service connection for the disability under treatment is granted after hospital admission, the rating will be from the first day of hospitalization if otherwise in order.

(c) The assignment of a total disability rating on the basis of hospital treatment or observation will not preclude the assignment of a total disability rating otherwise in order under other provisions of the rating schedule, and consideration will be given to the propriety of such a rating in all instances and to the propriety of its continuance after discharge. Particular attention, with a view to proper rating under the rating schedule, is to be given to the claims of veterans discharged from hospital, regardless of length of hospitalization, with indications on the final summary of expected confinement to bed or house, or to inability to work with requirement of frequent care of physician or nurse at home.

(d) On these total ratings Department of Veterans Affairs regulations governing effective dates for increased benefits will control.

(e) The total hospital rating if convalescence is required may be continued for periods of 1, 2, or 3 months in addition to the period provided in paragraph (a) of this section.

(f) Extension of periods of 1, 2 or 3 months beyond the initial 3 months may be made upon approval of the Veterans Service Center Manager.

(g) Meritorious claims of veterans who are discharged from the hospital with less than the required number of days but need post-hospital care and a prolonged period of convalescence will be referred to the Director, Compensation Service, under § 3.321(b)(1) of this chapter.

[29 FR 6718, May 22, 1964, as amended at 41 FR 11294, Mar. 18, 1976; 41 FR 34256, Aug. 13, 1976; 54 FR 4281, Jan. 30, 1989; 54 FR 34981, Aug. 23, 1989; 71 FR 28586, May 17, 2006; 79 FR 2100, Jan. 13, 2014]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 41 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2024 · leading case: Fenderson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 119 (Vet. App. 1999).
Fenderson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 119 (Vet. App. 1999). “, 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.29 , 4.30 (1998) (providing that total disability rating (100%) may be assigned in certain circumstances “without regard to other provisions of the rating schedule”, and that such total rating “will be followed by appropriate schedular evaluations”; “termination…”
Ohland v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 147 (Vet. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “A November 15, 1988, Regional Office (RO) rating decision temporarily awarded the appellant a 100-percent rating, effective June 5, 1988, pursuant to a VA regulation ( 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 (1990)) that provides for a temporary total disability rating during a period of VA…”
Robert J. Ingram v. R. James Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 232 (Vet. App. 2007). “Following those decisions, the appellant underwent numerous hospitalizations, each of which resulted in an RO decision that awarded the appellant a temporary total disability rating for the period of his hospitalization under 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 (1989) and “continued” his 70%…”
AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35 (Vet. App. 1993). “In a September 1, 1987, decision, a VA regional office (RO) awarded the veteran a temporary 100% disability rating for PTSD for periods of hospitalization for that condition in 1984 and 1985, see 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 (1992), and assigned a 10% disability rating effective January 1,…”
William F. Allen, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 237 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “The rating also included a temporary total disability rating under 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 for a period of 45 days prior to April 1, 1997.”
Charles L. Degmetich, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 104 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 1997). “See 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 (1995). 6 . 38 U.S.C. § 5110 (a) (formerly 38 U.”
Newgard v. Shinseki, 27 Vet. App. 879 (Fed. Cir. 2014). · cites it 4× “§ 1111 , and that he is entitled to a 100% disability rating based on 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 . The Government responds that the Veterans Court’s decision did not elaborate on the meaning of any statute or regulation, or involve a rule of law.”
Kirwin v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 148 (Vet. App. 1995). · cites it 5× “The RO awarded a temporary 100% rating for a period of hospitalization beginning February 28, 1982 (see 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 (1994)) and awarded a noncom-pensable rating effective April 1,1983.”
Hauck v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 518 (Vet. App. 1994). “Hauck (appellant) for an increased rating for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), currently rated as 50% disabling, and denying entitlement to a total evaluation under 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 (1993) for a service-connected disability requiring hospital treatment or observation…”
Lehman v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 339 (Vet. App. 1991). “See 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 (1990) (Ratings for service-connected disabilities requiring hospital treatment or observation.”
Snow v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 417 (Vet. App. 1991). “” Another rating decision was issued which granted appellant a temporary 100-percent rating for the time he was an inpatient {See 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 (1990) (total disability rating will be assigned when it is established that a service-connected disability has required hospital…”
Clark v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 166 (Vet. App. 1992). “See 38 C.F.R. § 4.29 (1991). Dissatisfied with the assigned ratings, appellant, through his representative, filed a Notice of Disagreement (NOD) to the June 1, 1989, rating decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.