38 C.F.R. § 9.6

Assignments

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance, Veterans' Group Life Insurance and benefits thereunder are not assignable.

[40 FR 4135, Jan. 28, 1975. Redesignated at 61 FR 20135, May 6, 1996]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2013–2017 · leading case: Hillman v. Maretta, 133 S. Ct. 1943 (2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hillman v. Maretta, 133 S. Ct. 1943 (2013). “V); 38 CFR § 9.6 (2012). The premise of Hillman's argument is that FEGLIA's assignment provision suggests that an employee has a less substantial interest in who ultimately receives the proceeds.”

Marriage of Steiner (Cal. Ct. App. 2017). “( 38 C.F.R. § 9.6 .) Like comparable federal enactments, the SGLIA evinces Congress's intent to accord service members "an unfettered 'freedom of choice' in selecting the beneficiary of the insurance proceeds and to ensure the proceeds would actually 'belong' to that 4…”

Furman v. Steiner (In re Steiner), 225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 880 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017). “( 38 C.F.R. § 9.6 .) Like comparable federal enactments, the SGLIA evinces Congress's intent to accord service members "an unfettered 'freedom of choice' in selecting the beneficiary of the insurance proceeds and to ensure the proceeds would actually 'belong' to that beneficiary.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.