39 C.F.R. § 775.5
Emergencies
Where emergency circumstances make it necessary to take an action with reasonably foreseeable significant environmental effects without observing the provisions of these procedures, the Postal Service will consult with the CEQ about alternative arrangements for compliance with NEPA sec. 102(2)(C), 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1975–1978 · leading case: Morgan v. United States Postal Serv., 405 F. Supp. 413 (W.D. Mo. 1975).
Morgan v. United States Postal Serv., 405 F. Supp. 413 (W.D. Mo. 1975). “Shortly after the assessment was received by the Service, a negative declaration under 39 C.F.R. § 775.5 (1975) was made which stated that “the proposed use of the subject land will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment” and that no environmental impact…”
Twp. of Dover v. United States Postal Serv., 429 F. Supp. 295 (D.N.J. 1977). “…action” it was, nonetheless, determined that it did not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. 39 C.F.R. 775.5.”
Higgins v. United States Postal Serv., 449 F. Supp. 1001 (D. Mass. 1978). “39 C.F.R. § 775.5 . A negative declaration “is a written description of a proposed action, its expected environmental impact, and the basis for the conclusion that no significant adverse impact on the environment is anticipated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.