C.F.R. » Title 39 » CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE › SUBCHAPTER N—PROCEDURES › PART 912—PROCEDURES TO ADJUDICATE CLAIMS FOR PERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE ARISING OUT OF THE OPERATION OF THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE

39 C.F.R. § 912.8

Sufficiency of evidence and information submitted

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In order to exhaust the administrative remedy provided, a claimant shall submit substantial evidence to prove the extent of any losses incurred and any injury sustained, so as to provide the Postal Service with sufficient evidence for it to properly evaluate the claim.

[45 FR 43720, June 30, 1980]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1997–2023 · leading case: Pagel v. United States, 986 F. Supp. 1315 (N.D. Cal. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pagel v. United States, 986 F. Supp. 1315 (N.D. Cal. 1997). · cites it 5× “” 39 C.F.R. § 912.8 . 8 C. Plaintiffs Have Adequately Exhausted Their Administrative Remedies Defendant’s position regarding the instant motion for summary judgment is succinctly stated as follows in its opening brief: The Post Office’s contention here is simple: that by…”
Dodd v. United States (M.D. Fla. 2022). “A claimant may refuse to comply with 39 C.F.R. § 912.8 , requests from the agency for additional documentation, and the fine print in the SF-95 that directs claimants to “substantiate” a claim with “competent evidence”—all without sacrificing the jurisdiction of the federal…”
Waters v. United States (M.D. Fla. 2023). “Specifically, the United States cites 39 C.F.R. § 912.8 , which states that “[i]n order to exhaust the administrative remedy provided, a claimant shall submit substantial evidence to prove the extent of any losses incurred and any injury sustained, so as to provide the Postal…”
Blackmon v. The United States of Am. (S.D. Miss. 2021). “39 C.F.R. §912.8 5 Section 912.7 of the Code of Federal Regulations provides in part: (b) Personal injury.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.