40 C.F.R. § 51.1
Who is responsible for actions described in this subpart?
States must inventory emission sources located on nontribal lands and report this information to EPA.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1973–1991 · leading case: Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Thomas, 838 F.2d 1224 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Thomas, 838 F.2d 1224 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “40 C.F.R. § 51.1 (kk)(1). Here it uses as the baseline the rate provided in the “new source performance standards” (“NSPS”) promulgated for new power plants under § 111 of the Act, 42 U.”
Hancock v. Train, 426 U.S. 167 (1976). “1 (p) (1975) defines “compliance schedule” as “the date or dates by which a source or category of sources is required to comply with specific emission limitations contained in an implementation plan and with any increments of progress toward such compliance.”
Sierra Club v. Env't Prot. Agency, 719 F.2d 436 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “5864 (1982) (to be codified in 40 C.F.R. §§ 51.1 , 51.12, 51.18). Petitioners NRDC and Sierra Club filed motions for reconsideration on various grounds, all of which were denied.”
Agrico Chem. Co. v. Dep't, Etc., 406 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). “Environmental Protection Agency Determinations of Reasonably Available Control Technology pursuant to 40 C.F.R. Section 51.1(0) and 40 C.F.R., Part 51, Appendix B; and Environmental Protection Agency determinations of Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources, pursuant…”
Michigan v. Thomas, 805 F.2d 176 (6th Cir. 1986). ““Reasonably available control technology” has been defined at 40 C.F.R. § 51.1 (o) to mean “devices, systems, process modifications, or other apparatus or techniques, the application of which will permit attainment of the emission limitations set forth in Appendix B to this part.”
Navistar Int'l Transp. Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 941 F.2d 1339 (6th Cir. 1991). “4 “Reasonably available control technology” (RACT) has been defined at 40 C.F.R. § 51.1 (o) to mean “devices, systems, process modifications, or other apparatus or techniques, the application of which will permit attainment of the emission limitations set forth in Appendix B to…”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc., a Non-Profit New York Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 507 F.2d 905 (9th Cir. 1974). “” 40 C.F.R. § 51.1 (n). 25 . Further, the implementation plan drafted in accordance with this statute expressly states that “[alpproval of such a permit will not absolve the owner of the responsibility to continue to comply with applicable standards or rules and regulations.”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 489 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1974). “40 C.F.R. § 51.1 (n) (1972). . See generally S.”
Buckeye Power, Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 481 F.2d 162 (6th Cir. 1973). “” ( 40 C.F.R. § 51.1 (n) (1972)). . The distinction between individual adjudication and rulemaking can become blurred in borderline cases.”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 489 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1974). “40 C.F.R. 51.1(n) (1972). 3 See generally S.”
— 40 C.F.R. § 51.1(0) — 1 case
Agrico Chem. Co. v. Dep't, Etc., 406 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). “Environmental Protection Agency Determinations of Reasonably Available Control Technology pursuant to 40 C.F.R. Section 51.1(0) and 40 C.F.R., Part 51, Appendix B; and Environmental Protection Agency determinations of Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources, pursuant…”
— 40 C.F.R. § 51.1(ii)(2)(i) — 1 case
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Thomas, 838 F.2d 1224 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “40 C.F.R. § 51.1 (kk)(1). Here it uses as the baseline the rate provided in the “new source performance standards” (“NSPS”) promulgated for new power plants under § 111 of the Act, 42 U.”
— 40 C.F.R. § 51.1(kk)(2) — 1 case
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Thomas, 838 F.2d 1224 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “40 C.F.R. § 51.1 (kk)(1). Here it uses as the baseline the rate provided in the “new source performance standards” (“NSPS”) promulgated for new power plants under § 111 of the Act, 42 U.”
— 40 C.F.R. § 51.1(n) — 1 case
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 489 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1974). “40 C.F.R. 51.1(n) (1972). 3 See generally S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.