40 C.F.R. § 61.140

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to those sources specified in §§ 61.142 through 61.151, 61.154, and 61.155.

[55 FR 48414, Nov. 20, 1990]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1989–2009 · leading case: State v. Harenda Enter., Inc., 2008 WI 16, 746 N.W.2d 25.
State v. Harenda Enter., Inc., 2008 WI 16, 746 N.W.2d 25. · cites it 4× “¶ 8 The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is authorized by the Wisconsin Statutes to promulgate rules implementing clean air standards consistent with chapter 285 of the Wisconsin Statutes and the federal Clean Air Act.”
United States v. Grace, 455 F. Supp. 2d 1122 (D. Mont. 2006). · cites it 4× “” Also under that heading is 40 C.F.R. § 61.140 , which states: “The provisions of this subpart are applicable to those sources specified in §§ 61.”
Adair v. Troy State Univ. of Montgomery, 892 F. Supp. 1401 (M.D. Ala. 1995). · cites it 2× “See 40 C.F.R. § 61.140 et seq., 36 FR 5931 ; Mar.”
City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum Co., 828 F. Supp. 851 (D. Kan. 1993). “4 Plaintiff does not argue otherwise, but contends that the “inevitability” of compliance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (“NESHAP”), 40 C.F.R. §§ 61.140 to — .156(m), is an injury that entitles it to recover damages now for the costly control…”
United States v. Edwards, 496 F.3d 677 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “See 40 C.F.R. § 61.140 et seq. The regulations differentiate between asbestos-containing materials that are “friable” — meaning “that, when dry, [they] can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure” — and materials that are “nonfriable.”
United States v. Am. Nat'l Can Co., 126 F. Supp. 2d 521 (N.D. Ill. 2000). · cites it 2× “The current form of the asbestos NESHAP is found at 40 C.F.R. § 61.140 et seq. Specifically with respect to renovation, the asbestos NESHAP requires that owners provide prior notification and meet certain work practice standards when a jurisdictional amount of friable asbestos…”
Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 770 S.W.2d 180 (Ark. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Appellant contends that it incurred those costs as a direct result of 40 C.F.R. Sections 61.140 through 61.153 and 29 C.”
United States v. James Edward Bragg, 207 F.3d 394 (7th Cir. 2000). “See generally 40 C.F.R. § 61.140 , et seq. 9 . See generally 29 C.”
United States v. Shaw, 150 F. App'x 863 (10th Cir. 2005). “§ 7412 (b), (d)(1); 40 C.F.R. §§ 61.140 ef seq. 13 . The refinery was divided into three areas— A, B and C.”
Fried v. Sungard Recovery Servs., Inc., 900 F. Supp. 758 (E.D. Pa. 1995). “40 C.F.R. § 61.140 -.157. Although there is no cite to a specific section of NESA, the reference to renovations brings one to the only section in NESA that applies to renovations, 40 C.”
Fried v. Sungard Recovery Servs., Inc., 916 F. Supp. 465 (E.D. Pa. 1996). “These laws are found in the Clean Air Act, 42 U.”
Liddell v. Bd. of Educ. of City of St. Louis, 771 F. Supp. 1496 (E.D. Mo. 1991). “§ 2641-2656 (1990) and the National Emission Standard for Asbestos (NESHAP), 40 CFR § 61.140 , et seq., and numerous EPA regulations, while adhering to the mandates of this Court's orders, L(1570)87 and L(2090)88.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.