C.F.R. » Title 43 » CHAPTER II—BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL MANAGEMENT (1000) › PART 1600—PLANNING, PROGRAMMING, BUDGETING › Subpart 1610—Resource Management Planning

43 C.F.R. § 1610.4-6

Estimation of effects of alternatives

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Field Manager, in collaboration with any cooperating agencies, will estimate and display the physical, biological, economic, and social effects of implementing each alternative considered in detail. The estimation of effects shall be guided by the planning criteria and procedures implementing the National Environmental Policy Act. The estimate may be stated in terms of probable ranges where effects cannot be precisely determined.

[48 FR 20368, May 5, 1983, as amended at 70 FR 14567, Mar. 23, 2005; 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016; 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2012 · leading case: Silverton Snowmobile Club v. United States Forest Serv., 433 F.3d 772 (10th Cir. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Silverton Snowmobile Club v. United States Forest Serv., 433 F.3d 772 (10th Cir. 2006). “In fact, appellants do not and cannot dispute that the challenged decision was made only (1) after preparation of an environmental assessment of the proposed action and alternatives to it as provided by 43 CFR 1610.4-6 and 1610.5-5, (2) full public involvement in which BLM and…”
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Salazar, 993 F. Supp. 2d 1126 (C.D. Cal. 2012). · cites it 2× “” 43 C.F.R. § 1610.4-6 . This estimation is guided by NEPA’s procedures and “may be stated in terms of probable ranges where effects cannot be precisely determined.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.