43 C.F.R. § 1610.4-9

Monitoring and evaluation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The proposed plan shall establish intervals and standards, as appropriate, for monitoring and evaluation of the plan. Such intervals and standards shall be based on the sensitivity of the resource to the decisions involved and shall provide for evaluation to determine whether mitigation measures are satisfactory, whether there has been significant change in the related plans of other Federal agencies, State or local governments, or Indian tribes, or whether there is new data of significance to the plan. The Field Manager shall be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the plan in accordance with the established intervals and standards and at other times as appropriate to determine whether there is sufficient cause to warrant amendment or revision of the plan.

[48 FR 20368, May 5, 1983, as amended at 70 FR 14567, Mar. 23, 2005; 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016; 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2004 · leading case: ONRC Action v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 150 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

ONRC Action v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 150 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 1998). “43 C.F.R. § 1610.4-9 (1997). Section 1610.”

S. Utah Wilderness All. v. Norton, 301 F.3d 1217 (10th Cir. 2002). “” 43 C.F.R. § 1610.4-9 . . On appeal, there has been some suggestion by the parties that SUWA's LUP claims, particularly with regard to the Factory Butte area, are now moot because the BLM implemented the LUP requirements after SUWA instituted the present litigation.”

S. Utah v. Norton (10th Cir. 2004). “” 43 C.F.R. § 1610.4-9 . -34- D. Partial Compliance For the reasons outlined in our discussion of SUWA’s nonimpairment claims, we also reverse the district court’s conclusion that the BLM cannot be compelled under § 706(1) to comply with the LUP requirements because, “while the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.