43 C.F.R. § 1871.1-1

Cases subject to equitable adjudication

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The cases subject to equitable adjudication by the Director, Bureau of Land Management, cover the following:

(a) Substantial compliance: All classes of entries in connection with which the law has been substantially complied with and legal notice given, but the necessary citizenship status not acquired, sufficient proof not submitted, or full compliance with law not effected within the period authorized by law, or where the final proof testimony, or affidavits of the entryman or claimant were executed before an officer duly authorized to administer oaths but outside the county or land district, in which the land is situated, and special cases deemed proper by the Director, Bureau of Land Management, where the error or informality is satisfactorily explained as being the result of ignorance, mistake, or some obstacle over which the party had no control, or any other sufficient reason not indicating bad faith there being no lawful adverse claim.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1985–1985 · leading case: Ramstad v. Hodel, 756 F.2d 1379 (9th Cir. 1985).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Ramstad v. Hodel, 756 F.2d 1379 (9th Cir. 1985). · cites it 3× “The BLM also denied Ramstad’s request for equitable adjudication on the ground that he had not shown substantia] compliance with the law as required by 43 C.F.R. § 1871.1-1 (1983). 4 Ramstad appealed to the Interior Board of Land Appeals, which affirmed the BLM’s decision.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.