C.F.R. » Title 43 » CHAPTER II—BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER C—MINERALS MANAGEMENT (3000) › PART 3800—MINING CLAIMS UNDER THE GENERAL MINING LAWS › Subpart 3809—Surface Management

43 C.F.R. § 3809.3

What rules must I follow if State law conflicts with this subpart?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If State laws or regulations conflict with this subpart regarding operations on public lands, you must follow the requirements of this subpart. However, there is no conflict if the State law or regulation requires a higher standard of protection for public lands than this subpart.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2018 · leading case: Joshua Bohmker v. State of Oregon, 903 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Joshua Bohmker v. State of Oregon, 903 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir. 2018). · cites it 3× “8 ; 43 C.F.R. §§ 3809.3 , 3809.420(b), declare it the policy of the United States to assure that mining satisfies the nation’s “environmental needs,” 30 U.”
Reoforce, Inc. v. United States, 118 Fed. Cl. 632 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “415 (a) (obligating a mining claimant to comply with “the terms and conditions of your notice or approved plan of operations and other Federal and State laws related to environmental protection and protection of cultural resources”); 43 C.F.R. § 3809.3 (requiring a mining…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.