C.F.R. » Title 43 » CHAPTER II—BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER D—RANGE MANAGEMENT (4000) Group 4100—Grazing Administration › PART 4100—GRAZING ADMINISTRATION—EXCLUSIVE OF ALASKA › Subpart 4130—Authorizing Grazing Use

43 C.F.R. § 4130.3-1

Mandatory terms and conditions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The authorized officer shall specify the kind and number of livestock, the period(s) of use, the allotment(s) to be used, and the amount of use, in animal unit months, for every grazing permit or lease. The authorized livestock grazing use shall not exceed the livestock carrying capacity of the allotment.

(b) All permits and leases shall be made subject to cancellation, suspension, or modification for any violation of these regulations or of any term or condition of the permit or lease.

(c) Permits and leases shall incorporate terms and conditions that ensure conformance with subpart 4180 of this part.

[49 FR 6453, Feb. 21, 1984, as amended at 53 FR 10234, Mar. 29, 1988. Redesignated at 60 FR 9965, Feb. 22, 1995, and amended at 60 FR 9966, Feb. 22, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2012–2014 · leading case: W. Watersheds Proj. v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 721 F.3d 1264 (10th Cir. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 721 F.3d 1264 (10th Cir. 2013). “In 1987, pursuant to these authorities, the BLM developed a land use plan for the Lander Field Office, which oversees the Split Rock allotments.”
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Salazar, 843 F. Supp. 2d 1105 (D. Idaho 2012). · cites it 2× “” See 43 C.F.R. § 4130.3-1 . Under these regulations, to make “significant progress,” the BLM must see “measurable and/or observable changes” demonstrating improvement.”
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Jewell, 56 F. Supp. 3d 1182 (D. Idaho 2014). “” See 43 C.F.R. § 4130.3-1 . The FRH regulations are time-sensitive and compulsory.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.