45 C.F.R. § 60.2

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The regulations in this part establish reporting requirements applicable to hospitals, health care entities, Boards of Medical Examiners, and professional societies of health care practitioners which take adverse licensure or professional review actions; state licensing or certification authorities, peer review organizations, and private accreditation entities that take licensure or certification actions or negative actions or findings against health care practitioners, health care entities, providers, or suppliers; entities (including insurance companies) making payments as a result of medical malpractice actions or claims; and Federal government agencies, state law and fraud enforcement agencies and health plans that take final adverse actions against health care practitioners, providers, and suppliers. They also establish procedures to enable individuals or entities to obtain information from the NPDB or to dispute the accuracy of NPDB information.

[78 FR 20484, Apr. 5, 2013, 78 FR 25860, May 6, 2013]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2004–2023 · leading case: Detillier v. Kenner Reg'l Med. Ctr., 877 So. 2d 100 (La. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Detillier v. Kenner Reg'l Med. Ctr., 877 So. 2d 100 (La. 2004). “45 CFR § 60.2 . In the case of covered state health care providers, who are "considered as a named insured" under the Public Act at R.”

Doe v. Rodgers, M.H.A., 139 F. Supp. 3d 120 (D.D.C. 2015). “” 45 C.F.R. § 60.2 . The details of the procedures to dispute the accuracy of an Adverse Action Report are discussed infra at part B(5).”

Wisner v. Dignity Health CA3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2022). “§ 11133 (a); 45 C.F.R. §§ 60.2 , 60.3, 60.4, 60.12(a)(ii)(A); U.”

Wisner v. Dignity Health (Cal. Ct. App. 2022). “§ 11133 (a); 45 C.F.R. §§ 60.2 , 60.3, 60.4, 60.12(a)(ii)(A); U.”

Satgunam v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (E.D. Mich. 2023). “” 45 C.F.R. § 60.2 . Under those regulations, a physician who is the subject of a report can seek Secretarial review of the report.”

Knitter v. United States (D.N.D. 2023). “See 45 C.F.R. § 60.2 . The NPDB is a data clearinghouse created by Congress to “collect and release certain information relating to the professional competence and conduct of physicians, dentists, and other health care practitioners.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.